2012
DOI: 10.2514/1.c031405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Turbulent Boundary Layer Models for Acoustic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suitable for a wide range of Mach number in the range 0.41-2.1 [23]. Besides the two models mentioned above, several other models have been proposed (as reviewed by Miller [46], Graham [47] and Hwang [48]). The purpose of this study is not to select the best model of the turbulent boundary layer, but to establish a better understanding of the sound transmission through the sandwich shells in the presence of the turbulent boundary layer excitation.…”
Section: The Model Of Pressure Fluctuation Due To Tblmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is suitable for a wide range of Mach number in the range 0.41-2.1 [23]. Besides the two models mentioned above, several other models have been proposed (as reviewed by Miller [46], Graham [47] and Hwang [48]). The purpose of this study is not to select the best model of the turbulent boundary layer, but to establish a better understanding of the sound transmission through the sandwich shells in the presence of the turbulent boundary layer excitation.…”
Section: The Model Of Pressure Fluctuation Due To Tblmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The low streamwise wave-number excitations exhibited by Eqs. (11) and (12) vary considerably and were thought to be representative of the variations seen in TBL CPSD formulations found in the literature [13]. It was of interest to consider the extent that differences in the low-wavenumber excitation might influence the outcome in this and similar multi-objective design studies.…”
Section: A Vibroacoustic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) and (14) are attributed to the Strouhal number Sh = coS/UT; the TBL convective velocity was assumed to be 70% of the freestream velocity, written as Uc = 0nU x \ and the flight condition was specified with a freestream velocity of Mach 0.85, and so the expression in Eq. (14) was interpolated accordingly.…”
Section: A Vibroacoustic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Noise generated by airflow over an airplane's surface is important for all classes of airplanes. For small airplanes, boundary-layer noise is only important at high frequencies, while high-speed flows in larger airplanes generate significant levels of turbulent boundary-layer noise, which is the most important source of cabin noise during cruise [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%