2022
DOI: 10.3390/photonics9020113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Virus Inactivation by Visible Light

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic is driving the search for new antiviral techniques. Bacteria and fungi are known to be inactivated not only by ultraviolet radiation but also by visible light. Several studies have recently appeared on this subject, in which viruses were mainly irradiated in media. However, it is an open question to what extent the applied media, and especially their riboflavin concentration, can influence the results. A literature search identified appropriate virus photoinactivation publications and, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a clinical study with another enveloped virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV), it was demonstrated that 2 h treatment of blood samples of HBV patients with 400–500 nm wavelength visible light in combination with riboflavin resulted in significant decrease of HBV DNA copy number in the blood [ 16 ]. A summary of virucidal effects of a range of visible wavelengths of blue light (401–470 nm) on a number of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses have been recently reviewed [ 17 ], with findings providing sufficient evidence that pathogen reduction technologies can incorporate safer visible violet-blue light in lieu of UV light for viral inactivation, in addition to its already well-established bacterial inactivation potential in various public health scenarios [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a clinical study with another enveloped virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV), it was demonstrated that 2 h treatment of blood samples of HBV patients with 400–500 nm wavelength visible light in combination with riboflavin resulted in significant decrease of HBV DNA copy number in the blood [ 16 ]. A summary of virucidal effects of a range of visible wavelengths of blue light (401–470 nm) on a number of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses have been recently reviewed [ 17 ], with findings providing sufficient evidence that pathogen reduction technologies can incorporate safer visible violet-blue light in lieu of UV light for viral inactivation, in addition to its already well-established bacterial inactivation potential in various public health scenarios [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R DFI = ratio of sample change mean of ratio of controls change (7) The closer the ratio R DFI is to one, the smaller is the effect of cataract formation If the ratio R DFI is greater than one, irradiation has a greater impact on cataract formation than the decay effect.…”
Section: Ratio Of Sample Change =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the change in lenses for each wavelength, the corresponding ratios of pixel change R DFI of all lenses, calculated according to Equation (7), are presented in the boxplots in Figure 5. The ratios R DFI for the irradiation with 407 nm and 463 nm exhibit similar median values with 1.40 and 1.41 but the mean value with standard deviation at 407 nm of 1.61 ± 0.83 is higher than the mean value at 463 nm of 1.26 ± 1.52.…”
Section: Dark Field Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, researchers have demonstrated that the deep ultraviolet (DUV) (λ < 300 nm, including UVC) can inactivate the novel coronavirus COVID‐19 effectively within a few seconds. [ 1–4 ] Besides, applications of deep UV in water purification and air disinfection are demonstrated as well. [ 5–7 ] In fact, UV has been proven to be a sterilizing agent since early times, it has been over a century since light therapy was presented by Niels Ryberg Finsen who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1903 due to using concentrated beams of UV light to treat patients with lupus vulgaris with some success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%