2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of vulnerability indicators for fire risk assessment in cultural heritage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches, for example, Lagomarsino (2006) and Podestà and Romano (2014), proposed vulnerability curves for frequently found heritage typologies (church, monastery/convent, mosque, tower, and so on). A large number of studies have been also dedicated to the vulnerability analysis and modeling of cultural heritage to other types of hazards such as flooding (Garrote et al 2020;Figueiredo et al 2021) and fires (Salazar et al 2021).…”
Section: Vulnerability In Cultural Heritage Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches, for example, Lagomarsino (2006) and Podestà and Romano (2014), proposed vulnerability curves for frequently found heritage typologies (church, monastery/convent, mosque, tower, and so on). A large number of studies have been also dedicated to the vulnerability analysis and modeling of cultural heritage to other types of hazards such as flooding (Garrote et al 2020;Figueiredo et al 2021) and fires (Salazar et al 2021).…”
Section: Vulnerability In Cultural Heritage Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study assesses the vulnerability of the selected heritage sites in Srinagar as they are prone to multiple hazards. Vulnerability evaluation of the sites was carried out by incorporating spatial and structural indicators, namely drainage, road networks, slope, nearness to fire station, distance from urban settlements, age and construction material of the structure (Bukhari et al, 2016; Cochrane & Schaad, 1992; Salazar et al, 2021). The data for the generation of the vulnerability matrix was obtained from primary and secondary sources.…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessments Of Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies examined the conservation of tangible and intangible cultural heritage of nations and peoples. These include solutions for the conservation of cultural heritage [4], digital management methods [5,6], the need for funding heritage projects [7], indicators of vulnerability and risk [8], as well as multi-threat studies of cultural heritage [9][10][11]. For the present work, progress is also being made in creating theoretical frameworks for conserving vernacular houses based on values [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%