2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review on City-Level Carbon Accounting

Abstract: Carbon accounting results for the same city can differ due to differences in protocols, methods and data sources. A critical review of these differences and the connection among them can help to bridge our knowledge between university-based researchers and protocol practitioners in accounting and taking further mitigation actions. The purpose of this study is to provide a review of published research and protocols related to city carbon accounting paying attention to both their science and practical actions. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) has developed a series of guidelines for provincial greenhouse gas inventories in China (NDRC, 2011). Some additional studies even focused on a finer scale: the city level (Chen et al, 2019;. Shan et al (2018a), Shan et al (2019) and Ramaswami et al (2017) individually developed city-level emissions accounting frameworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) has developed a series of guidelines for provincial greenhouse gas inventories in China (NDRC, 2011). Some additional studies even focused on a finer scale: the city level (Chen et al, 2019;. Shan et al (2018a), Shan et al (2019) and Ramaswami et al (2017) individually developed city-level emissions accounting frameworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If d is positive, then the drag effect of carbon emissions on urbanisation and the drag effect of economic growth are the same. On the basis of the existing research literature and related statistics, China's urbanisation development and carbon emissions are positively correlated [43,55,56]. Therefore, the drag effect here should also be positive.…”
Section: Drag Effect Model Of Carbon Emission In the Process Of Urbanmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The electricity producing facilities in Table 5 are the facilities reported in Baltimore's 2014 SRI that fall within the city limits of Baltimore. Electricity consumption from facilities outside of the city's limits should only be considered Scope 2 [7,8] and therefore are not included in Hestia-Baltimore Scope 1 FFCO 2 emissions. Only FFCO 2 emissions are included in the comparison in Table 5.…”
Section: Comparing Hestia-baltimore With Self-reported Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cities may focus on improving traffic flow along the highest-emitting road segments to reduce CO 2 emissions from vehicle congestion [5,6]. Finally, they are often a mixture of the traditional emission scopes-Scope 1 (all emissions within a geographical boundary), 2 (emissions driven by the consumption of electricity), and 3 (emissions driven by the consumption of materials, goods, and services) [7,8]. This mixture may accommodate city-specific emissions policies or monitoring requirements, but it limits the ability of the SRIs to be compared to atmospheric monitoring, the only current means to independently evaluate emissions and provide constructive feedback on the uncertainties in Scope 1 emissions to city planners [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%