2022
DOI: 10.1109/taffc.2019.2927337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review on Psychological Stress Detection Using Biosignals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
312
2
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 434 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 239 publications
9
312
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They could only achieve a 0.43 F1 score (with three classes) and listed the additional difficulties of working in the wild while explaining the reasons for the relatively low performance [32]. The performance of daily life stress monitoring systems is lower than studies conducted in controlled environments due to the mentioned issues such as low-quality physiological signals with artifacts and the difficulty of collecting the ground truth in [33,34] (see Table 1).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They could only achieve a 0.43 F1 score (with three classes) and listed the additional difficulties of working in the wild while explaining the reasons for the relatively low performance [32]. The performance of daily life stress monitoring systems is lower than studies conducted in controlled environments due to the mentioned issues such as low-quality physiological signals with artifacts and the difficulty of collecting the ground truth in [33,34] (see Table 1).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, we had two types of class labels in the laboratory environment stress detection experiment: PSS-5 self-reports and the known context (the stressor level). On the other hand, in the wild, we had only self-reports of individuals, which was among the reasons why daily life stress detection performances were low [34], and there is still a room for improvement in daily life stress detection research.…”
Section: Testing the Models In The Wildmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress detection models based on physiological signals allow us to objectively monitor the driver’s stress level in real time. They mainly use the heart rate signal, skin conductance, skin temperature and the encephalogram [ 41 , 42 ]. The main disadvantage of these methods is that they require the use of sensors, which increases the cost and reduces the number of potential participants.…”
Section: Related Work On Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAD decision is based on frame energy value E f , frame zero-crossing measure value ZC f , threshold energy value E th , and zero-crossing threshold value ZC th , as presented in Eq. (6). The proposed VAD algorithm detects voiced speech frames, since only in these frames of the speech signal, the pitch value can be determined.…”
Section: Voice Activity Detection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the direct text input, the ASR and its submodules can provide the NLP with additional meta-information, which can be used to improve the virtual agents' response to the user's communication. Some categories of such meta-information are emotions, stress level [6], effects of spontaneous speech, speakers' change [7]. As an example, change of speaker influences dialogue modelling, which can be seen as an essential part of language generation with NLP approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%