Proceedings of the 2015 Joint International Mechanical, Electronic and Information Technology Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2991/jimet-15.2015.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review on the Test Method of Adhesive Failure in Solid Rocket Motor

Abstract: Abstract. This paper introduced common detection methods of adhesive failure in solid rocket motor including ultrasonic method, X ray radiography technique, industrial CT, infrared heat wave method and laser holographic interferometry. It also recommended the most suitable detection methods for various types of debonding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent this incident, the installation of thermal insulation must be done carefully and using the appropriate material. The installation of thermal insulation should also be checked using the NDT method [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prevent this incident, the installation of thermal insulation must be done carefully and using the appropriate material. The installation of thermal insulation should also be checked using the NDT method [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic Test (UT) NDT method also can detect cracks, voids, debonding and delamination. UT method is mostly used to detect the delamination between casing, insulation and propellant in the solid rocket motor [19,20]. In practical implementation, these two NDT methods (X-ray and UT) are used simultaneously to check the structure of the casing, thermal insulation and propellant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic testing (UT) provided valuable insights into internal structures but had challenges in detecting surface defects. X-ray inspection and computed tomography (CT) imaging offered comprehensive internal views but were limited in surface defect detection [28]. Magnetic particle inspection excelled in surface flaw identification but struggled with subsurface defects.…”
Section: Non Destructive Testing: Imaging Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%