2017
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1341617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review: the reemergence of brachytherapy as treatment for non-melanoma skin cancer

Abstract: Electronic brachytherapy (EBT) has seen a significant rise in use over the past few years in treating non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). However, the current literature in EBT remains scarce. Existing data on high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with surface applicators is often used to justify its efficacy and safety. In this review we study the two treatment modalities on their efficacy in treating NMSC and we explore the reasons behind the recent uprise in EBT. A literature review using PubMed was performed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic brachytherapy with sealed solid sources is an alternative method that showed excellent results. Its limitation is mainly due to the difficulty to treat large lesions or lesions with nonplanar concave or convex surfaces (the nose, ears, lips, external genitals) [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic brachytherapy with sealed solid sources is an alternative method that showed excellent results. Its limitation is mainly due to the difficulty to treat large lesions or lesions with nonplanar concave or convex surfaces (the nose, ears, lips, external genitals) [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lesions of less than 4 cm in diameter and an invasion depth of less than 5 mm, contact brachytherapy, also known as plesiotherapy, is indicated. Brachytherapy techniques have been used to treat skin cancer for more than a century [ 18 ], but in recent years, it has become increasingly common, as a growing body of evidence supports its efficacy and safety [ 19 ]. These studies report excellent local control, which varies from 83.3 to 98% or even 100% of cases, depending on the scheme used and the tumor histology, site, size, and depth [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the aforementioned advantages, especially in some settings, it should be noted that cHDR-RT has a limited spread in the clinical practice across the different countries (36,37). However, it is interesting to note the actual trend on the use of cHDR-RT in NMSC, showing a renewed interest (38). In particular, cHDR-RT has been demonstrated to be a valid therapeutic option especially in cases of extreme stress for the health systems (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%