2021
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviewing and assessing existing meta-analysis models and tools

Abstract: Over the past few years, meta-analysis has become popular among biomedical researchers for detecting biomarkers across multiple cohort studies with increased predictive power. Combining datasets from different sources increases sample size, thus overcoming the issue related to limited sample size from each individual study and boosting the predictive power. This leads to an increased likelihood of more accurately predicting differentially expressed genes/proteins or significant biomarkers underlying the biolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the various meta-analysis methods applicable to transcriptomic data [ 11 ], we employed a model that combines the effect sizes (log fold change of the ratio of the gene expression under hypoxia and normoxia) on gene expression across the individual studies. This allowed us, not only to identify the set of genes differentially regulated in response to hypoxia, but also to estimate the magnitude of change for each gene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various meta-analysis methods applicable to transcriptomic data [ 11 ], we employed a model that combines the effect sizes (log fold change of the ratio of the gene expression under hypoxia and normoxia) on gene expression across the individual studies. This allowed us, not only to identify the set of genes differentially regulated in response to hypoxia, but also to estimate the magnitude of change for each gene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software version 3.0 (CMAV3.0) was used to implement all the data analysis as we mentioned above ( Makinde et al 2021 ). To determine which statistical model is suitable in the current analysis, between-study heterogeneity, across the included studies, was estimated by using Higgins and Thompson’s I 2 test ( Borenstein et al 2011 ) and Cochran’s Q test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, meta-analysis is an objective method for statistically re-analyzing existing empirical literature, enabling a more unbiased evaluation of the evidence than that provided by traditional narrative commentary (Egger et al, 1997). It has been widely used to summarize and further explore complex biological mechanisms (Makinde et al, 2021), and it has also been applied in genetic studies of crop heterosis, grain yield, and stress tolerance (Li et al, 2011;Thiemann et al, 2014;Sharma et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2021). As an important plant architectural trait, LA affects the ability of the maize canopy to capture light and the light energy utilization efficiency of the population, understanding natural variation in LA and identifying its key genes are very important for breeding maize with high photosynthetic efficiency (Tao et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%