Reviewing the labyrinth of psychological resilience: Establishing criteria for resilience-building programs.

Abstract

There is a growing interest in developing resilience-building programs in the work context. Yet the resilience literature provides no clear answer about what constitutes such a program. The aim of this article is to shed light on this question by presenting a set of criteria for resilience-building programs. We developed these criteria by systematically reviewing studies that synthesized the evidence about the definition, conceptualization, measurement, and enhancement of psychological resilience. A literature search in peer-review journals published between 2009 and 2018 using PsycINFO resulted in 286 hits. Twenty-one studies met our inclusion criteria. In addition, we consulted 3 handbooks on resilience. The result of our review is a checklist of 12 criteria for resilience-building programs to improve program consistency and quality. These criteria address the necessity to: specify which working population is in need of psychological resilience; cite which definition is being used; display and explain the process that people go through in order to adapt to adversity; describe how resilience will be measured and enhanced as a dynamic process, as well as say which type of positive adaptation—to which adversity, in which work context, and when—is involved; and make clear the starting point and purpose of the work. These criteria can be regarded as a valuable navigation tool in the complex field of resilience: Program developers can use them to optimize the content of resilience-building programs and to ensure that relevant information is reported; reviewers of resilience-building programs can use them to analyze, evaluate, and compare programs. Therefore, the checklist could become an indispensable tool for both researchers and practitioners to improve designing, describing, and reviewing resilience-building programs at work.

When problems just bounce back: about the relation between resilience and academic success in German tertiary education

“…This approach follows previous empirical research studies. 1 A recent overview of a large number of studies and resilience programs further extends the classical definition described here and identifies other strands, which might be especially beneficial for researchers working on the development and implementation of resilience-training (IJntema et al 2019 ).…”

Resilience mechanisms at work: The psychological immunity-psychological elasticity (PI-PE) model of psychological resilience

“…The PI-PE model is restricted to psychological resilience, which emphasizes resilience in psychological functioning: the interplay between a person’s behaviour, cognition and affect at a certain time in a certain context (IJntema et al, 2019 ). We derived this model from the existing literature regarding the crucial elements in any process model of psychological resilience (Bonanno et al, 2015 ; Fisher et al, 2019 ; IJntema et al, 2019 ) and from the literature regarding adaptive and maladaptive outcomes following stressful events or circumstances (e.g. Ayed et al, 2019 ; Carver, 1998 ; Zautra, Arewasikporn, & Davis, 2010a ).…”

“…Even though this dichotomy may have an intuitive appeal, scientists nowadays agree that psychological resilience should not be treated as a single, isolated construct (e.g. outcome variable or attribute), but rather as a dynamic process by which people adapt to stressful events or circumstances they are exposed to (Bonanno et al, 2015 ; Fisher et al, 2019 ; IJntema et al, 2019 ). To date, research has identified several trajectories which could be considered as resilience trajectories, for example, sustainability, recovery and (posttraumatic) growth (e.g.…”

“…In addition, they do not clearly distinguish mechanisms (i.e. mediating variables) from moderating variables influencing this process (IJntema et al, 2019 ). Finally, existing dynamic process models (e.g.…”

Psychological Resilience of Volunteers in a South African Health Care Context: A Salutogenic Approach and Hermeneutic Phenomenological Inquiry

“…Psychological resilience is defined as a dynamic process of positive adaptation in the face of adversity [33,34]. Stressful work-life circumstances increase the risk for poor mental health, yet many people resile despite the difficulties they must endure [35].…”