2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviewing the purpose of professional experience: A case study in initial teacher education reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These broader conceptualisations of classroom readiness are consistent with previous considerations of the connections between theory and practice (Jenset, Klette, and Hammerness 2018;Cohen, Hoz, and Kaplan 2013). Curtis, Martin, and Broadley (2019) argue that ITE should be based on a professional community model, grounded in reflective partnerships between universities and schools. In both the wider literature and the conceptions of Brown (2015), Larsen (2017) and Hudson et al (2021), context is a fundamental part of classroom readiness.…”
Section: Classroom Readiness As a Conceptual Frameworksupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These broader conceptualisations of classroom readiness are consistent with previous considerations of the connections between theory and practice (Jenset, Klette, and Hammerness 2018;Cohen, Hoz, and Kaplan 2013). Curtis, Martin, and Broadley (2019) argue that ITE should be based on a professional community model, grounded in reflective partnerships between universities and schools. In both the wider literature and the conceptions of Brown (2015), Larsen (2017) and Hudson et al (2021), context is a fundamental part of classroom readiness.…”
Section: Classroom Readiness As a Conceptual Frameworksupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Debates about how teacher educators 'should' be preparing classroom teachers is a recurring focus of international policy for example, in Australia (Alexander and Bourke 2021), New Zealand (Brooks 2021), the UK (Mutton, Burn, and Menter 2017;Mutton et al 2021) and the USA (Darling-Hammond 2010; Fuller and Stevenson, 2018), where policymakers have increased centralisation, with generic curricula that prescribe how preservice teachers learn to teach in practice. ITE in general, and school placements especially have been frequently (re)positioned as a technical apprenticeship, where pre-service teachers train to become teachers (Curtis, Martin, and Broadley 2019;Mutton, Burn, and Menter 2017;Mutton et al 2021). The specific focus on training, as opposed to education, has led some to argue that this limits opportunities for pre-service teachers to sufficiently integrate theory, research and practice and therefore reduces their capacity to be classroom ready (for example, Allen and Elizabeth Wright 2014).…”
Section: Classroom Readiness As a Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los resultados de la mencionada evaluación generaron aportes que pueden ser utilizados para el mejoramiento de los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje en varios escenarios relacionados como: en las instituciones de educación superior formadoras de docentes en sus programas curriculares, en el aula de clase en relación a los procesos de enseñanza, en la comunidad educativa que se beneficia directamente, en las entidades territoriales y gubernamentales que lideran políticas públicas, y en la sociedad en general que, en definitiva, siempre debate sobre las metodologías y fines de la educación (Curtis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…At present, the volleyball teaching evaluation is usually in the final examination, through the final examination results of students' Volleyball learning ability and quality evaluation summary [1][2]. Volleyball teachers in the teaching process, mainly around the final examination content to teach students knowledge and skills, resulting in students learning volleyball initiative interest is not high, little interest in physical exercise, volleyball teaching activities carried out by the significance is ignored [3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%