Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have an increased stroke risk compared with those in sinus rhythm, although the absolute risk for individual patients is modulated by the presence of various additional risk factors. Patient selection for oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention is based on risks of stroke and bleeding. Although CHADS 2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischemic attack) is the most widely used scheme for evaluating stroke risk in patients with AF, several other stroke risk factors are not included; therefore, many patients' stroke risk may be underestimated, contributing to the underuse of anticoagulants. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of patients are categorized as being at moderate risk (CHADS 2 = 1), and there has been some ambiguity regarding optimum thromboprophylaxis in this group. -VASc = 0), who are unlikely to benefit from antithrombotic therapy. For all others, an oral anticoagulant may be the preferred approach, simplifying clinical decision making. Implementation of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc may also result in an increased proportion of patients receiving anticoagulation. The emergence of newer oral anticoagulants that can be given without routine coagulation monitoring, with improved benefit-risk profiles vs vitamin K antagonists, promises to simplify therapy for patients with AF at risk of stroke. This, coupled with advances in stroke risk stratification, is expected to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of AF-related stroke.
IntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia encountered in the outpatient clinic, 1 affecting ∼ 1% of the US population and up to 10% of individuals age ≥80 years, with a higher prevalence among men than among women at all ages. 2 It is predicted that the prevalence of AF will continue to rise in the coming decades. 3 Patients with AF are at an increased risk of cardioembolic stroke; their risk is approximately 5-fold greater than for patients in sinus rhythm, 4 although the absolute risk for individual patients is highly variable depending on the presence or absence of various risk factors. 5,6