2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-148x.2012.00975.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviewing the somatic genetics of melanoma: from current to future analytical approaches

Abstract: Summary Metastatic melanoma has traditionally been difficult to treat, and although molecularly based targeted therapies have shown promising results, they have yet to show consistent improvements in overall survival rates. Thus, identifying the key mutation events underlying the etiology of metastatic melanoma will no doubt lead to the improvement of existing therapeutic approaches and the development of new treatment strategies. Significant advances toward understanding the complexity of the melanoma genome … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While activating mutations in BRAF and NRAS occur in melanoma at rates of 41% and 18%, respectively (25), lower mutation frequency or gene amplifications in other signaling molecules, such as RTKs, can also contribute to melanoma pathogenesis (26)(27)(28). UNC1062 was developed as a MERTKselective tyrosine kinase inhibitor ( Figure 5A).…”
Section: A Novel Mertk Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Unc1062 Inhibits Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While activating mutations in BRAF and NRAS occur in melanoma at rates of 41% and 18%, respectively (25), lower mutation frequency or gene amplifications in other signaling molecules, such as RTKs, can also contribute to melanoma pathogenesis (26)(27)(28). UNC1062 was developed as a MERTKselective tyrosine kinase inhibitor ( Figure 5A).…”
Section: A Novel Mertk Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Unc1062 Inhibits Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the oncogenic pressure is relieved (by targeted inhibition of the gene or pathway), the transformed phenotype is partially or fully alleviated. Although the mechanism underlying the upregulation of PKCe in melanoma is not yet known, it is probable that it is linked to mutation(s) currently being discovered as part of the effort to map the melanoma genome (Dutton-Regester and Hayward, 2012;Walia et al, 2012). In the case of ATF2, PKCe functions as the addicting signal to maintain nuclear localization of ATF2 and thus prevents its pro-apoptotic function at the mitochondria.…”
Section: Cytoplasmic Accumulation Of Atf2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were recruited from either (a) families with a known mutation in the CDKN2A/p16 (or simply, p16 ) tumor suppressor that confers 28–76% lifetime risk to US residents (Begg et al, 2005; Bishop et al, 2002) or (b) other melanoma-prone families in which magnitude of risk is similar (35–70x approximate relative risk; Dutton-Regester & Hayward, 2012; Kefford et al, 1999), but for whom the melanoma risk cannot be attributed to currently known melanoma predisposition genes. Importantly, based on prior genetic testing of family members, these control families were known not to carry a p16 mutation, and thus new participants recruited from these families served as “no-test controls.”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%