2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2007
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2007.4436963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised consistency conditions for PET data

Abstract: Tomographic Data Consistency Conditions (TDCC) are frequently employed to improve the quality of PET data. However, most of these consistency conditions were derived from X-ray computerized tomography (CT) and their validity for other imaging modalities has not been well established. For instance, it is well known from (X-ray) CT data that the sum of the projection data from one view of the parallel-beam projections is a constant independent of the view-angle. This consistency condition is based on well-known … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistency conditions for the Radon transform are only accurate for continuous data with zero-width lines of response with uniform sensitivity. Herraiz et al 21 showed that small animal PET systems with their finite width, asymmetric responses are not "ideal" and that the consistency conditions are only approximately valid. We assert that our proposed use of the consistency conditions is still valid because we are ranking the consistency of projection data with different attenuation corrections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistency conditions for the Radon transform are only accurate for continuous data with zero-width lines of response with uniform sensitivity. Herraiz et al 21 showed that small animal PET systems with their finite width, asymmetric responses are not "ideal" and that the consistency conditions are only approximately valid. We assert that our proposed use of the consistency conditions is still valid because we are ranking the consistency of projection data with different attenuation corrections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%