2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.67.125015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised phase diagram of the Gross-Neveu model

Abstract: We confirm earlier hints that the conventional phase diagram of the discrete chiral Gross-Neveu model in the large N limit is deficient at non-zero chemical potential. We present the corrected phase diagram constructed in mean field theory. It has three different phases, including a kink-antikink crystal phase. All transitions are second order. The driving mechanism for the new structure of baryonic matter in the Gross-Neveu model is an Overhauser type instability with gap formation at the Fermi surface.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
215
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
21
215
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Incidentally, we should like to point out that all the fat lines in Fig. 3 representing the boundaries of the sheets I, II have been taken from sources independent of the present work [15,17,19]. The fact that the computed surfaces connect very accurately constitutes a test for our algebraic and numerical calculations.…”
Section: ) Crystal Phase and The Revised Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Incidentally, we should like to point out that all the fat lines in Fig. 3 representing the boundaries of the sheets I, II have been taken from sources independent of the present work [15,17,19]. The fact that the computed surfaces connect very accurately constitutes a test for our algebraic and numerical calculations.…”
Section: ) Crystal Phase and The Revised Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This issue was addressed by Barducci et al in 1995 [15] (for earlier, partial results, see also [16]). Recent findings about the massless GN model [17,18,19] cast doubts on the full validity of their calculations. The assumption that the scalar condensate is spatially homogeneous is apparently too restrictive and misses important physics related to the existence of kink-antikink baryons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To see what happens at imaginary µ, it is again advantageous to switch to the Casimir interpretation: T, µ are mapped onto the size L and the boundary phase θ, and there is no known mechanism which would induce a breakdown of translational invariance as a function of these parameters in a quantum phase transition. To further test this intuitive expectation, we have [21,22]. The critical line AB is the same as in Fig.…”
Section: Kink-antikink Crystal From Imaginary Chemical Potential?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5 have been derived under the assumption that the order parameter ψ ψ is constant in space, i.e., the mean field acts like a mass term. Actually, at real chemical potential, an inhomogeneous phase with a periodically modulated scalar condensate, a kink-antikink crystal, is more stable in some part of the (µ, T )-plane [21,22]. The phase diagram of the GN model including the crystal phase is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Kink-antikink Crystal From Imaginary Chemical Potential?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to Thies and Urlichs, the phase diagram is analytically known in the limit of many flavours N [15]. This model therefore provides for a benchmark test for any new numerical method which tries to extend its reach to very dense fermionic systems.…”
Section: Setup Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%