2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised phylogeny of Rhizobiaceae: Proposal of the delineation of Pararhizobium gen. nov., and 13 new species combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

4
109
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
109
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was proposed to retain the genus Agrobacterium to accommodate predominantly phytopathogenic species. This recommendation was supported by multilocus sequence analysis of plant-associated members of the Rhizobiaceae (Mousavi et al, 2014(Mousavi et al, , 2015 and the analysis of wholegenome averaged nucleotide identity of the family members that have been sequenced thus far (Ormeno-Orrillo et al, 2015). Furthermore, Mousavi et al (2014Mousavi et al ( , 2015 proposed reclassifying several Rhizobium species in the novel genera Pararhizobium and Neorhizobium and the revived genus Allorhizobium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was proposed to retain the genus Agrobacterium to accommodate predominantly phytopathogenic species. This recommendation was supported by multilocus sequence analysis of plant-associated members of the Rhizobiaceae (Mousavi et al, 2014(Mousavi et al, , 2015 and the analysis of wholegenome averaged nucleotide identity of the family members that have been sequenced thus far (Ormeno-Orrillo et al, 2015). Furthermore, Mousavi et al (2014Mousavi et al ( , 2015 proposed reclassifying several Rhizobium species in the novel genera Pararhizobium and Neorhizobium and the revived genus Allorhizobium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This recommendation was supported by multilocus sequence analysis of plant-associated members of the Rhizobiaceae (Mousavi et al, 2014(Mousavi et al, , 2015 and the analysis of wholegenome averaged nucleotide identity of the family members that have been sequenced thus far (Ormeno-Orrillo et al, 2015). Furthermore, Mousavi et al (2014Mousavi et al ( , 2015 proposed reclassifying several Rhizobium species in the novel genera Pararhizobium and Neorhizobium and the revived genus Allorhizobium. Based on this approach, further strains currently ascribed to the genus Rhizobium were identified that may represent as yet undescribed genera within the family Rhizobiaceae (Mousavi et al, 2015;Ormeno-Orrillo et al, 2015), and therefore further splitting of the genus can be expected that is not reflected in the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Allorhizobium, Neorhizobium, Rhizobium and Pararhizobium has been suggested recently (Mousavi et al, 2014(Mousavi et al, , 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…anhuiense' CCBAU 23252 (99.7 %), followed by R. leguminosarum USDA 2370 T (98.6 %), R. sophorae CCBAU 03386 T , R. phaseoli ATCC 14482 T , R. fabae CCBAU 33202 T and R. pisi DSM 30132 T (98.3 %), R. laguerreae FB206 T (97.8 %) and R. etli CFN 42 T (97.7 %) ( Table 1). All of these species are members of the recently revised genus Rhizobium (Mousavi et al, 2014(Mousavi et al, , 2015. Taking the threshold of 97 % similarity for species delineation (Graham et al, 1991), all these species were closely related rhizobia and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis was unable to differentiate them clearly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%