2014
DOI: 10.1128/aac.03172-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Testing Telavancin: Effect on MIC Results and Correlation with Other Testing Methodologies

Abstract: The reference broth microdilution (BMD) antimicrobial susceptibility testing method for telavancin was revised to include dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent and diluent for frozen-form panel preparation, following the CLSI recommendations for water-insoluble agents. Polysorbate 80 (P-80) was also added to the test medium to minimize proven drug losses associated with binding to plastic surfaces. Four hundred sixty-two Gram-positive isolates, including a challenge set of organisms with reduced susceptibilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the telavancin potency observed was at least 8-fold greater than tested comparators. These results confirm telavancin had more potent activity when compared to earlier studies [22][23][24] that underestimated the potency of the drug due to solubility and drug binding to plastic trays during susceptibility testing [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the telavancin potency observed was at least 8-fold greater than tested comparators. These results confirm telavancin had more potent activity when compared to earlier studies [22][23][24] that underestimated the potency of the drug due to solubility and drug binding to plastic trays during susceptibility testing [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Isolates were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution following CLSI guidelines [17]. Telavancin was tested by the revised method according to CLSI [18,20] and product package insert [14] using panels manufactured at JMI Laboratories (2015) or purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (2013-2014) (Cleveland, Ohio, USA). Quality control for MIC values were quality assured by concurrently testing S. aureus (ATCC 29213) and E. faecalis (ATCC 29212).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the MIC testing method and the susceptibility breakpoint (Յ0.125 g/ml) have changed due to the use of polysorbate 80 to prevent adherence of the drug to plastic surfaces and minimize MIC variability (11,34). Nonetheless, we utilized isolates with baseline vancomycin MICs of 2 g/ml, which may already have variable mechanisms for lower susceptibility to vancomycin, including a thickened cell wall; thus, no further increases in the MICs may be feasible with the exposures simulated in the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal international surveillance of telavancin activity continues to demonstrate potent activity against these pathogens [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Broth MIC test methods for telavancin have recently been revised [22]. Representative telavancin potency against a collection of Gram-positive clinical isolates collected from US hospitals in 2011 and 2012 is provided in TABLE 1 [23].…”
Section: Microbiologymentioning
confidence: 99%