PsycTESTS Dataset 2002
DOI: 10.1037/t11615-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We ran moderated regression to test Hypothesis 2, using a composite index combining all self-management scales due to their moderate to high intercorrelations (see Table 1) (indicating that people commonly apply multiple self-leadership strategies to accomplish goals; Anderson & Prussia, 1997). This composite index conforms with Houghton and Neck's (2002) confirmatory factor analysis that found that a second-order factor explains first-order factors representing self-leadership strategies.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We ran moderated regression to test Hypothesis 2, using a composite index combining all self-management scales due to their moderate to high intercorrelations (see Table 1) (indicating that people commonly apply multiple self-leadership strategies to accomplish goals; Anderson & Prussia, 1997). This composite index conforms with Houghton and Neck's (2002) confirmatory factor analysis that found that a second-order factor explains first-order factors representing self-leadership strategies.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Manz and Neck, 2004; Neck and Houghton, 2006), including behaviour-focused strategies, constructive thought pattern strategies and natural reward strategies. This theoretically assumed three-factor structure of the construct with a general self-leadership factor has proven accurate in the measurement of self-leadership (Houghton and Neck, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was compared to a general-factor-model, whose fit was clearly worse (xi = 203.9, p < .001). Although the scales of the German Self-leadership Questionnaire were more aggregated than those of questionnaires used by Prussia, et al (1998) and Houghton and Neck (2002) and included additional strategies, the three-dimensional structure of self-leadership could be replicated. Hence, Hypothesis 1 was confirmed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%