1995
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199503000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting. Histological analysis of four cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
76
0
10

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
76
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few studies have dealt with the incorporation on histological examination, and the correlation between radiography and the histological finding is unclear (Gordon et al 1985). In clinical reports on histological analysis of the allografts , Heekin et al 1995, Nelissen et al 1995, Ullmark and Linder 1998, a picture similar to ours is seen, with islands of regenerating living bone, mixed with areas of necrotic remnants of the graft but with no signs of remodeling. Even though a very osteogenic material was used in our study, i.e., autologous cancellous graft, we found little, if any, remodeling in the center of the fractured vertebral body as long as 18-20 months after the operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, few studies have dealt with the incorporation on histological examination, and the correlation between radiography and the histological finding is unclear (Gordon et al 1985). In clinical reports on histological analysis of the allografts , Heekin et al 1995, Nelissen et al 1995, Ullmark and Linder 1998, a picture similar to ours is seen, with islands of regenerating living bone, mixed with areas of necrotic remnants of the graft but with no signs of remodeling. Even though a very osteogenic material was used in our study, i.e., autologous cancellous graft, we found little, if any, remodeling in the center of the fractured vertebral body as long as 18-20 months after the operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The advocates of this stem design in revision with impacted allograft have suggested that the design permits gradual subsidence of the implant within the cement mantle because of plastic deformation of the cement and even viscoelastic deformation of the graft [10]. This leads to a self-tightening that allows restabilisation within the cement [4,9] and provides a beneficial compressive load to the allograft [19]. However, other authors question whether subsidence of a polished stem can be beneficial or if relatively high subsidence of a stem can lead to clinical failures [3,15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histological findings in biopsies from 4 patients the second year after impaction have been reported (Nelissen et al 1995). Morphological studies of graft material from biopsies and autopsies of 14 patients, of which 5 were done in the first year after surgery, have also been described (Linder 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%