2018
DOI: 10.1177/0890334418775624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision Lingual Frenotomy Improves Patient-Reported Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: We demonstrated that besides nipple pain, measures of infant reflux symptoms and maternal breastfeeding self-confidence can improve following full release of the lingual frenulum. Additionally, a patient population was identified that could benefit from increased scrutiny of infant tongue function when initial frenotomy fails to improve breastfeeding symptoms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
64
2
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
64
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some practitioners believe that there are deep attachments of the frenulum, warranting a deeper incision (Fabbie et al, ). Heated debates take place in social media bringing into question the “completeness” of a frenotomy procedure, particularly when improvement does not occur after a procedure (Ghaheri, ) and in these circumstances it is not uncommon for babies to be considered for a second or multiple frenotomies (Ghaheri et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some practitioners believe that there are deep attachments of the frenulum, warranting a deeper incision (Fabbie et al, ). Heated debates take place in social media bringing into question the “completeness” of a frenotomy procedure, particularly when improvement does not occur after a procedure (Ghaheri, ) and in these circumstances it is not uncommon for babies to be considered for a second or multiple frenotomies (Ghaheri et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median sample size of the studies was 58 (range support, [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and four of the studies screened all infants born during the study period. 22,25,39,40 Not all studies listed explicit inclusion or exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Sample Size and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,25,39,40 Not all studies listed explicit inclusion or exclusion criteria. Beyond breastfeeding difficulties, some studies restricted inclusion to certain infant age ranges, 27,28,[34][35][36][37]41 specific tongue tie severity 22,31,41 or baseline LATCH score. 41 Exclusion criteria included the presence of other oral anomalies, 25,28,32,40,41 prematurity, 25,[33][34][35]41 medical co-morbidities, 25,34,35,40 maternal breast surgery 34,35 and delivery complications.…”
Section: Sample Size and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations