2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2020.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of Malaligned Lapidus and Nonunited Lapidus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,[23][24][25] After the MLP, excessive motions around the fusion site can occur causing an increase in the intermetatarsal angle, especially in the presence of IJH. 26 Besides, biomechanical and clinical studies have demonstrated that the IJH is more common in patients with HV than in the normal population. Evidence suggests that HV is actually a multiplanar instability with a combination of an increased transverse and rotational movements of the medial cuneiform in relation to the middle cuneiform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,[23][24][25] After the MLP, excessive motions around the fusion site can occur causing an increase in the intermetatarsal angle, especially in the presence of IJH. 26 Besides, biomechanical and clinical studies have demonstrated that the IJH is more common in patients with HV than in the normal population. Evidence suggests that HV is actually a multiplanar instability with a combination of an increased transverse and rotational movements of the medial cuneiform in relation to the middle cuneiform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial outcomes of this triplanar correction demonstrate a powerful correction with greater stability [4][5][6] . Complications, including nonunion, malunion, recurrence, and transfer metatarsalgia, are similar to those of other hallux valgus correction techniques; however, complication rates may be lower with the Lapidus procedure 5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The most common complication of Lapidus arthrodesis is a high non-union rate(9) which may require revision procedures like bone grafting and revision fixation(10). Inadequate contact of the fusion surfaces due to suboptimal osteotomies lead to delayed fusion and subsequent loss of implant stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%