2003
DOI: 10.1080/03014223.2003.9518344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of New Zealand Bryocorinae and Phylinae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Miridae)

Abstract: INTRODUCTIONOnly two species of Bryocorinae are known from New Zealand, both in the tribe Dicyphini: the indigenous Felisacus elegantulus (Reuter, 1904) which also lives in Australia, and the introduced species Engytatus nicotianae (Koningsberger, 1903), also known from Indonesia, Micronesia, and Melanesia. Until now the subfamily Phylinae in New Zealand had scarcely been studied, there being only three described species, with the recent addition of a fourth species from the Kermadec Islands. These are: in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparatively little taxonomic attention has been focused on this subfamily within the last 50 years. Most of the recent work on Bryocorinae taxonomy consist of numerous isolated descriptions of species and genera (e.g., Hernández & Stonedahl, ; Stonedahl & Hernández, ; Ribes & Ribes, ; Matocq & Ribes, ; Ribes & Baena, ) or regional treatments (e.g., Yasunaga, ; Hu & Zheng, , ; Eyles & Schuh, ). The only attempt to establish phylogenetic relationships among bryocorines was that of Schuh (), who used a limited number of morphological characters and a groundplan estimation approach for the tribes and subtribes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively little taxonomic attention has been focused on this subfamily within the last 50 years. Most of the recent work on Bryocorinae taxonomy consist of numerous isolated descriptions of species and genera (e.g., Hernández & Stonedahl, ; Stonedahl & Hernández, ; Ribes & Ribes, ; Matocq & Ribes, ; Ribes & Baena, ) or regional treatments (e.g., Yasunaga, ; Hu & Zheng, , ; Eyles & Schuh, ). The only attempt to establish phylogenetic relationships among bryocorines was that of Schuh (), who used a limited number of morphological characters and a groundplan estimation approach for the tribes and subtribes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5]. Narrow secondary strap of endosoma (e.g., figs 1-7) similar to that found in Xiphoides Eyles and Schuh (2003) from New Zealand and an undescribed myrmecomorphic taxon from northwestern Argentina. Partial narrow secondary strap also found in an undescribed Australian taxon near Xiphoides used as an outgroup in the present phylogenetic analysis, but endosoma always forming a distinct coil in Xiphoides and the last taxon and the right paramere in those taxa always with a conspicuous, long, fingerlike process apically (Eyles and Schuh, 2003: figs.…”
Section: Ammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 appears to be similar to the sclerotised curled duct described and illustrated inXiphoides Eyles & Schuh, 2003 and other genera of Phylini (Eyles & Schuh 2003).…”
Section: Key To the Species Of Tridiplousmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…A key to the subfamilies of Miridae in New Zealand is provided in Eyles & Schuh (2003). Two of the three tribes of Orthotylinae are represented in New Zealand.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%