2019
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4543.4.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the genus Carybdea (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Carybdeidae): clarifying the identity of its type species Carybdea marsupialis

Abstract: While records of Carybdea marsupialis in the literature suggest a worldwide distribution of this species, the validity of some of these records has been questioned recently, as has the validity of some nominal Carybdea species. We inspected material of all known species of Carybdea from multiple locations (i.e. Spain, Algeria, Tunisia, Puerto Rico, California, Hawaii, Australia, South Africa, and Japan) using morphological and genetic tools to differentiate Carybdea species as well as understand their evolutio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 787 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the morphological analyses of this study I conclude that the Polynesian carybdeid populations from Nuku Hiwa and Mangareva belong to none of the eight currently accepted species (Acevedo et al 2019) Bigelow (1909) of a carybdeid medusa sampled during the Albatross Expedition 1904-05 in Mangareva, the Gambier Islands (French Polynesia) with preserved carybdeid medusae (C, F, H, K, M) sampled during the Dana Expedition 1928-30 in Nuka Hiwa, the Marquesas (French Polynesia): A: Sketch of habitus (bell height 14 mm); B: Photo of habitus (bell height 14 mm), C: Habitus of preserved specimen (bell height 15 mm); D: Sketch of diaginal section of bell at apex level; E: Sketch of longitudinal section of bell at apex level, note very short manubrium; F: Lateral view of apex of preserved specimen, note very short manubrium; G: Sketch of gastric phacellum, note thick, branched stems of filaments; H: Gastric phacellum of preserved specimen, note thick, branched stems (contracted state) of filaments; I: Sketch of longitudinal section of bell at rhopalial niche level, note single triangular covering scale hanging over rhopalium; J: Sketch of rhopalium, note 6 eyes (2 median, 2 lateral pit eyes and 2 lateral slit eyes); K: Lateral view of rhopalial niche with rhopalium; L: Sketch of diagonal section of bell at velarium level, note 4 simple velarial canals per quadrant; M: quadrant of velarium, dotted lines mark 4 quite simple velarial canals: cv/vc: velarial canal; f/fr: frenulum; gp: gastric phacellum; M: manubrium; o1: single ocelli (median eyes); o2: paired ocelli (lateral eyes); oc: otocyst (statocyst); t: stump of tentacle Jan 1925: Undetermined: BH 14 mm, IPD 13 mm, PL 9 mm, PW 4 mm; males: BH: 9-14 mm, IPD 9-13 mm, PL 6-9 mm, PW 3-4 mm; juveniles: 9-14 mm, IPD 9-13 mm, PL 6-9 mm, PW 3-4 mm. USA: Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), Harvard University, Cambridge: French Polynesia, Gambier Islands, Mangareva, Rikitea Harbor (23°07′03.0″S 134°58′08.6″W), surface, 3 specimens, collected by Agassiz (U.S. Albatross), 27 Jan-05 Feb 1905 (Agassiz 1906, Bigelow 1909 Examined material: Holotype; Allotype; 8 Paratypes; 5 medusae from Niku Hiva, Marquesas, French Polynesia (Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the morphological analyses of this study I conclude that the Polynesian carybdeid populations from Nuku Hiwa and Mangareva belong to none of the eight currently accepted species (Acevedo et al 2019) Bigelow (1909) of a carybdeid medusa sampled during the Albatross Expedition 1904-05 in Mangareva, the Gambier Islands (French Polynesia) with preserved carybdeid medusae (C, F, H, K, M) sampled during the Dana Expedition 1928-30 in Nuka Hiwa, the Marquesas (French Polynesia): A: Sketch of habitus (bell height 14 mm); B: Photo of habitus (bell height 14 mm), C: Habitus of preserved specimen (bell height 15 mm); D: Sketch of diaginal section of bell at apex level; E: Sketch of longitudinal section of bell at apex level, note very short manubrium; F: Lateral view of apex of preserved specimen, note very short manubrium; G: Sketch of gastric phacellum, note thick, branched stems of filaments; H: Gastric phacellum of preserved specimen, note thick, branched stems (contracted state) of filaments; I: Sketch of longitudinal section of bell at rhopalial niche level, note single triangular covering scale hanging over rhopalium; J: Sketch of rhopalium, note 6 eyes (2 median, 2 lateral pit eyes and 2 lateral slit eyes); K: Lateral view of rhopalial niche with rhopalium; L: Sketch of diagonal section of bell at velarium level, note 4 simple velarial canals per quadrant; M: quadrant of velarium, dotted lines mark 4 quite simple velarial canals: cv/vc: velarial canal; f/fr: frenulum; gp: gastric phacellum; M: manubrium; o1: single ocelli (median eyes); o2: paired ocelli (lateral eyes); oc: otocyst (statocyst); t: stump of tentacle Jan 1925: Undetermined: BH 14 mm, IPD 13 mm, PL 9 mm, PW 4 mm; males: BH: 9-14 mm, IPD 9-13 mm, PL 6-9 mm, PW 3-4 mm; juveniles: 9-14 mm, IPD 9-13 mm, PL 6-9 mm, PW 3-4 mm. USA: Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), Harvard University, Cambridge: French Polynesia, Gambier Islands, Mangareva, Rikitea Harbor (23°07′03.0″S 134°58′08.6″W), surface, 3 specimens, collected by Agassiz (U.S. Albatross), 27 Jan-05 Feb 1905 (Agassiz 1906, Bigelow 1909 Examined material: Holotype; Allotype; 8 Paratypes; 5 medusae from Niku Hiva, Marquesas, French Polynesia (Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Standard measurements were used (Straehler-Pohl 2014, Acevedo et al 2019): bell height (BH) as length between bell turn-over (velarium excluded from measurement) and top of apex; interpedalial diameter (IPD) as distance between opposite pedalia (outer pedalial wing edges) at the level of the bell turn-over; pedalia length (PL) from attachment to bell (pedalial base) to the tentacle insertion; pedalial width (PW) at the widest diagonal level.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A: habitus, sampled by AC Morandini; B: gastric phacellus, note bush-like shape. C: gastric filaments (photo by AC Morandini), note tree-like shape with fused stalks originating from one root, branching several times towards the distal end; D: heart-shaped rhopalial niche, note long and broad niche channel running from niche towards bell rim; E: pedalium, note inner pedalial wing overhanging tentacle insertion (arrow; photo by AC Morandini); F: pedalial canal knee bend with volcano-shaped appendage (white arrow); G: velarium, octant, note 2 canal roots with up to 5 velarial canals of diverse shapes, lobations and branching, canal tips rounded; Carybdea murrayana: H: habitus of paralectotype; I: gastric phacellus, note bush-like shape, note single rooted attachment, and multiple branching of filaments; J: heart-shaped rhopalial niche, note broad niche channel running from niche towards bell rim; K: pedalium, note inner pedalial wing overhanging tentacle insertion (arrow); L: pedalial canal knee bend (dotted line) with volcano-shaped appendage (arrow); M: velarium, octant, note 2 canal roots with up to 5 velarial canals of diverse shapes, lobations and branching, canal tips rounded; Carybdea marsupialis: N: habitus, sampled by MJ Acevedo; O: gastric phacellus, note epaulette-shape; P: heart-shaped rhopalial niche (after Acevedo et al 2019), note short, narrow niche channel; Q: pedalium, note that inner wing does not overhang tentacle insertion, note also rounded pedalial canal knee bend without appendage (arrow); R: velarium, octant, note 3 canal roots with 1 branching canal per root (after Acevedo et al 2019); S: adult specimen, in-live, note brownish bases of gastric phacellae and nematocyst warts (photo by Eduardo Obis). f: frenulum; p: pedalium.…”
Section: Fig 5 Comparison Of Carybdea Branchi (A) Carybdea Murrayamentioning
confidence: 99%