2015
DOI: 10.1111/syen.12150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the Bicyclus sciathis species group (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with descriptions of four new species and corrected distributional records

Abstract: In this paper we present a thorough revision of the sciathis species group of the butterfly genus Bicyclus (Kirby). Type materials are discussed and in several cases lectotypes are assigned to specimens from original type series. Four new, and morphologically distinct, species are described (B. elishiae Brattström sp.n., B. heathi Brattström sp.n., B. sigiussidorum Brattström sp.n. and B. subtilisurae Brattström sp.n.), along with a comprehensive molecular phylogeny that includes exemplar taxa of all currently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more than 300 extant species of mycalesine butterflies show comparatively little morphological variation and can be notoriously challenging to identify. Hence, the wide diversity in the number, size and position of androconia on the wings of males has become the key taxonomic trait used to distinguish these species (Condamin 1973, Brattström et al 2016) Despite considerable periods of independent evolution (Aduse-Poku et al 2015), the three species used in this study demonstrate strikingly similar patterns of plasticity for androconial structures; the scent organs on the hindwing are largely insensitive to thermal variation while the same external cue induces the development of larger sexual structures on the forewing. Furthermore, similar patterns of androconial plasticity have been observed in Bicyclus sanaos and Mycalesis mineus, two mycalesine butterflies from Africa and Asia, respectively (van Bergen unpubl.)…”
Section: Androconial Plasticity In Mycalesine Butterfliesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The more than 300 extant species of mycalesine butterflies show comparatively little morphological variation and can be notoriously challenging to identify. Hence, the wide diversity in the number, size and position of androconia on the wings of males has become the key taxonomic trait used to distinguish these species (Condamin 1973, Brattström et al 2016) Despite considerable periods of independent evolution (Aduse-Poku et al 2015), the three species used in this study demonstrate strikingly similar patterns of plasticity for androconial structures; the scent organs on the hindwing are largely insensitive to thermal variation while the same external cue induces the development of larger sexual structures on the forewing. Furthermore, similar patterns of androconial plasticity have been observed in Bicyclus sanaos and Mycalesis mineus, two mycalesine butterflies from Africa and Asia, respectively (van Bergen unpubl.)…”
Section: Androconial Plasticity In Mycalesine Butterfliesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(B) Confirmed findings of B. anynana in Southeast Africa in the area indicated. This species can be found in: Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique, Socotra islands, Comoro islands, and South Africa (Otto, 2015;Brattström et al, 2016). accuracy of 0.1 log likelihood units.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, many species in the tribe Satyrini possess scent organs consisting of hairpencils (Fig 1 A,B) and scent patches (Fig 2A), both on the wing, that brush against each other dispersing chemicals in the process (Nieberding et al 2008;Brattström et al 2015Brattström et al , 2016Aduse-Poku et al 2017). It is to be noted however, that glandular, secretory cells underly some of the patches and produce pheromones, while other patches are not associated with such secretory cells (Bacquet et al 2015;Dion et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%