2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0016774600023398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the late Carboniferous megaflora from the De Lutte-06 well (Twente, the Netherlands), and its stratigraphical implications

Abstract: Biostratigraphical re-analysis of palaeobotanical data from the De Lutte-06 well clarifies an earlier controversy regarding the stratigraphical interpretation of this well based on palaeobotanical and palynological analysis. Previous biostratigraphical studies suggested an early Westphalian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We placed a caveat on the selection of the fossil with the highest coverage. Fossil prepollen of Potonieisporites D.C.Bhardwaj, a monosaccate type that was produced by walchian conifers, is known from at least as early as the Langsettian (Upper Carboniferous >313–314 Ma) from Scotland [43] while macrofossils of the walchian conifer Hermitia Kerp and Clement-Westerhof are known from at least as early as the Asturian ( = Westphalian D, 308–306 Ma) of the Netherlands [44] . Extant conifer families have fossil records extending from the Triassic [45] , [46] providing an expectation on the ‘upper’ distribution of reasonable S i values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We placed a caveat on the selection of the fossil with the highest coverage. Fossil prepollen of Potonieisporites D.C.Bhardwaj, a monosaccate type that was produced by walchian conifers, is known from at least as early as the Langsettian (Upper Carboniferous >313–314 Ma) from Scotland [43] while macrofossils of the walchian conifer Hermitia Kerp and Clement-Westerhof are known from at least as early as the Asturian ( = Westphalian D, 308–306 Ma) of the Netherlands [44] . Extant conifer families have fossil records extending from the Triassic [45] , [46] providing an expectation on the ‘upper’ distribution of reasonable S i values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seasonally dry floras from coal basins of the central and west-central Pangean equatorial region are often represented by allochthonous elements (transported from outside the habitat of burial and preservation; Condon 1997; Gastaldo and Degges 2007;Gibling et al 2010), though parautochthonous (transported but within the habitat of growth) and in situ assemblages are known (Cridland and Morris 1963;Winston 1983;Mapes and Rothwell 1988;McComas 1988;FalconLang 2006;van Waveren et al 2008;van Hoof et al 2012;Bashforth et al 2014 fig. 10D), perhaps during a change to greater rainfall seasonality at all phases of glacialinterglacial cycles (Cecil 1990;Bashforth et al 2014), and became an increasingly important element of these kinds of assemblages (Galtier et al 1992;Rothwell et al 1997;Hernandez-Castillo et al 2001b;Blake et al 2002;Falcon-Lang et al 2009;Plotnick et al 2009).…”
Section: Dryland Floral Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formation consists of a succession of reddish brown to grey-green, silty to very fine-grained sandy mudstones intercalated with light grey, white and pink fine to medium grained sandstones, and are informally referred to as the Barren Measures as coal seams are thin and rare (Van der Meer & Pagnier, 1996). A discrepancy that existed between the palynological and palaeobotanical age-interpretation of this well (Van Amerom, 1996;Van de Laar & Van der Zwan, 1996) has been resolved and it now seems that the bulk of the formation is early Stephanian in age (Van Hoof et al, 2007;Van Waveren et al, 2008). The soil types found are seat earths or gleys, ferralic soils, immature calcic soils and mature calcic soils (Van der Meer & Pagnier, 1996;Van der Zwan et al, 1993).…”
Section: Limburg (Tb Van Hoof Oa Abbink and Im Van Waveren)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This flora is comparable to Stephanian palynofloras, whereas the palaeobotanical interpretation suggested an Asturian association (Van Amerom, 1996). This controversy has recently been resolved by a re-investigation of both the palaeobotany and palynology, suggesting a Stephanian age for these deposits (Van Hoof et al, 2007;Van Waveren et al, 2008).…”
Section: Limburg Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%