2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis With Allograft Tendon Reconstruction for Symptomatic Failed Biceps Tenodesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Revision methods and outcomes for failed tenodesis are not well studied, and previous studies have had variable results. 12 , 13 One method is revision tenodesis through a subpectoral approach, with some studies showing patient satisfaction ranging from 88% to 100% with improvements in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. 8 , 12 Despite these results, other studies have shown complication rates as high as 48%, with additional operations required in 4% of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revision methods and outcomes for failed tenodesis are not well studied, and previous studies have had variable results. 12 , 13 One method is revision tenodesis through a subpectoral approach, with some studies showing patient satisfaction ranging from 88% to 100% with improvements in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. 8 , 12 Despite these results, other studies have shown complication rates as high as 48%, with additional operations required in 4% of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%