1992
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1992.01880070025005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision Rhinoplasty: An Analysis of Aesthetic Deformities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with that in mind, current literature has revision rates quoted as often times below 5%, but commonly in a 5% to 10% range as well. 16,17 The numbers from this study seem to be similar with the literature at large.…”
Section: Revision Rates and Annual Procedures Performedsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, with that in mind, current literature has revision rates quoted as often times below 5%, but commonly in a 5% to 10% range as well. 16,17 The numbers from this study seem to be similar with the literature at large.…”
Section: Revision Rates and Annual Procedures Performedsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The most commonly reported deformities after rhinoplasty have been located in the lower two thirds of the nose, with polly beak deformity specifically being very frequent (Parkes et al 1992). O'Conner and McGregor (1955) noted in their series of patients that the most common deformities were the ptotic tip and polly beak deformity.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one large series, lower third abnormalities were the most common reason for revision surgery, of which bossae were second only to pollybeak. 34 It is one of the more common complications of primary rhinoplasty and can occur in up to 4% of patients postoperatively. 35 Some surgeons divide bossae into two categories: early and late.…”
Section: Bossaementioning
confidence: 99%