2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03468-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision total knee arthroplasty for patellar dislocation in patients with malrotated TKA components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of patients treated with revision arthroplasty of the tibial and femoral components for PFI after TKA were recently described by Warschawski et al. [ 5 ]. In this study, patients underwent revision based on an intraoperative assessment of component positioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of patients treated with revision arthroplasty of the tibial and femoral components for PFI after TKA were recently described by Warschawski et al. [ 5 ]. In this study, patients underwent revision based on an intraoperative assessment of component positioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aetiology of PFI following TKA is either implant-related, soft-tissue-related, or a combination of the 2. The most frequently cited cause is femoral or tibial component internal rotation (IR) [ [3] , [4] , [5] ], and when present, revision arthroplasty is recommended [ 5 , 6 ]. What defines the threshold for malrotation has not been clearly defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical management of patella instability after TKA broadly follows one of two pathways [8]. Either revision of components deemed to be malpositioned [9] or patella stabilization with soft-tissue, bony or combined procedures [8,10,11]. Implant positioning limits have not been well defined, and revision of well-fixed implants is a morbid procedure associated with bone loss and soft tissue damage that often requires the use of highly constrained implants that have twice the failure rate of primary implants after 10 years [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Komponent malrotasyonu, uygunsuz patellar hazırlık (malpozisyon veya asimetrik kemik rezeksiyonu), yumuşak doku dengesizliği (medial retinaküler yetmezlik, vastus medialis kasının zayıflığı, kuadriseps kas kontraktürü, iliotibial bant gerginliği), valgus dizilim bozukluğu (Q açısını etkileyerek ekstansör mekanizma üzerinde dengesiz çekme yapar), protez tasarımındaki eksiklikler veya travma gibi problemler patella çıkığına neden olabilmektedirler (Şekil 4). [17] Femoral komponentin iç rotasyonda yerleştirilmesi troklear oluğu mediale yer değiştirtir. Bu lateral retinakulumun gerilimini artırarak patellanın laterale çıkma…”
Section: Patella Subluksasyonu Ve Patella çıKığıunclassified
“…Sonuç olarak her iki komponentin aşırı iç rotasyonda yerleştirilmesi patellar çıkık riskini artırmaktadır. [17,18] Patellar çıkığı olan hastalarda, ambulasyon yeteneğini yeniden kazanmak için genellikle revizyon cerrahisi gereklidir. Komponentlerin malpoziyonu durumlarında tüberositas tibia osteotomisi, lateral retinakuler gevşetme, medial patellofemoral ligament augmentasyonu veya rekonstrüksiyonu gibi cerrahi tedaviler önerilmektedir.…”
Section: Tibiofemoral çıKıkunclassified