2014
DOI: 10.1017/s148180350000350x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
102
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The CTAS was first implemented in 1999 in Canada and most recently revised in 2014 6. CTAS assigns acuity level of 1–5 (1 being the most urgent) using subjective and objective evaluation of chief complaint in conjunction with physiologic and historical modifiers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CTAS was first implemented in 1999 in Canada and most recently revised in 2014 6. CTAS assigns acuity level of 1–5 (1 being the most urgent) using subjective and objective evaluation of chief complaint in conjunction with physiologic and historical modifiers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home care billing records were used to identify which home care services a patient received on each day, including nursing, personal support and therapies (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, nutritional therapy and social work). The cohort was linked to emergency department records to identify any day that a patient visited the emergency department after 5 pm and to identify the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) 25 score, discharge disposition and primary diagnosis (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision [ICD-10-CA]) 26 associated with the visit. In the rare case that a patient visited the emergency department twice after 5 pm on the same day, only the first visit was included.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the analogy of an "air traffic control office" captures our goal for an intake and triage system, rather than multiple individual runways of arrivals and departures to our services. One existing approach for triage used in emergency rooms is the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (Bullard et al 2014) and Canadian Emergency Department Information Systems (CEDIS) identifiers for mental health. In addition, some practitioners are also using the level of care utilization system (LOCUS) tool (American Association of Community Psychiatrists 2010).…”
Section: Intake/triage Processmentioning
confidence: 99%