2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02199-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting abdominal closure in mesenteric ischemia: is there an association with outcome?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, up to 50% of patients require additional intestinal resection at relaparotomy 20 . However, studies examining this two-step therapy have revealed mixed survival benefits 21–23 …”
Section: Acute Mesenteric Ischemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historically, up to 50% of patients require additional intestinal resection at relaparotomy 20 . However, studies examining this two-step therapy have revealed mixed survival benefits 21–23 …”
Section: Acute Mesenteric Ischemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 However, studies examining this two-step therapy have revealed mixed survival benefits. [21][22][23] Given the discrepancies in previous studies and the various etiologies of intestinal ischemia (arterial occlusion, mesenteric venous thrombosis, nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia) the use of DCS is appropriate in most cases. In addition to physiologic derangement, the concomitant presence of intra-abdominal sepsis and the significant uncertainly regarding the viability of the remaining intestine both indicate the need for an OA and planned reexploration.…”
Section: Acute Mesenteric Ischemiamentioning
confidence: 99%