2011
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2011)101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting combinatorial ambiguities at Hadron Colliders with M T2

Abstract: We present a method to resolve combinatorial issues in multi-particle final states at hadron colliders. The use of kinematic variables such as M T 2 and invariant mass significantly reduces combinatorial ambiguities in the signal, but at a cost of losing statistics. We illustrate this idea with gluino pair production leading to 4 jets + E T in the final state as well as tt production in the dilepton channel. Compared to results in recent studies, our method provides greater efficiency with similar purity

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We must emphasise here that many distinctly different definitions of m T 2 have been considered in Ref. [58]. The authors in Ref.…”
Section: General Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must emphasise here that many distinctly different definitions of m T 2 have been considered in Ref. [58]. The authors in Ref.…”
Section: General Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose the pairing which gives the smaller value of M T2 . This method can be justified by the fact that the M T2 value would be bounded from above by the parent particle mass m a 0 1 if the right pairing is chosen, whereas there is no such a restriction if the pairing was wrong [93]. Since we here consider a light pseudoscalar boson, an upper cut on the M T2 < 25 GeV is further implemented.…”
Section: Collider Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the assumption of one particular underlying symmetry allows some fixed number of different topologies from which the correct one can be identified comparing suitable kinematic variables [13]. One expects that the ignorance of the correct topology can add difficulties in solving combinatorial ambiguity [14][15][16][17] which is one source of complexity in mass determination methods, more prominently available when associated with long decay chain. This ambiguity can be originated from two different sources.…”
Section: Jhep03(2015)142mentioning
confidence: 99%