2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2013.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Cross-document Structure Theory for multi-document discourse parsing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the ambiguity in the interpretation of certain CST relationships M a z i e r o, J o r g e and P a r d o [22] proposed several refinements to CST in order to reduce the ambiguity. They improved definitions by introducing several additional constraints on the co-occurrence of different relations in texts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the ambiguity in the interpretation of certain CST relationships M a z i e r o, J o r g e and P a r d o [22] proposed several refinements to CST in order to reduce the ambiguity. They improved definitions by introducing several additional constraints on the co-occurrence of different relations in texts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a starting point for the selection of features describing sentence pairs we used the set features proposed by M a z i e r o, J o r g e and P a r d o [22]. Our set includes commonly-used, lexical, syntactic and semantic features that were applied for the detection and recognition of CST relationships in supervised approaches.…”
Section: Baseline Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author proposed 24 CST relations, however, in this study we consider only 14 relations found in the corpus we use in our evaluation (see Section 4). Such relations are organized in a typology defined in [35] [36]. This typology is shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Cross-document Structure Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the meaning of the relationships defined in [35,36], these may assist in the clustering phase, in order to obtain a better selection of similar subtopics. This is due to the fact that it was found in previous work that the discourse relations are closely related to the lexical similarity of textual segments, i.e., the closer such segments are, the more CST relationships they have with each other and, therefore, the greater the chance is that the segments belong to the same subtopic.…”
Section: Cross-document Structure Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation