2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.04075
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Deep Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation

Abstract: Active learning automatically selects samples for annotation from a data pool to achieve maximum performance with minimum annotation cost. This is particularly critical for semantic segmentation, where annotations are costly. In this work, we show in the context of semantic segmentation that the data distribution is decisive for the performance of the various active learning objectives proposed in the literature. Particularly, redundancy in the data, as it appears in most driving scenarios and video datasets, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy selects which instances from the unlabeled pool should be queried for annotation at each iteration based on the informativeness of each instance -how useful labeling that instance is expected to be for improving the classifier's performance. 16 The goal is to query the most valuable instances to maximize the impact of each obtained label.…”
Section: Until the Stopping Criterion Metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy selects which instances from the unlabeled pool should be queried for annotation at each iteration based on the informativeness of each instance -how useful labeling that instance is expected to be for improving the classifier's performance. 16 The goal is to query the most valuable instances to maximize the impact of each obtained label.…”
Section: Until the Stopping Criterion Metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent active learning work has also looked at semantic segmentation [60] . Uncertainty-driven active learning identifies data samples with elevated aleatoric uncertainty.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%