Revisiting global satellite observations of stratospheric cirrus clouds

Abstract

Abstract. As knowledge about the cirrus clouds in the lower stratosphere is limited, reliable long-term measurements are needed to assess their characteristics, radiative impact and important role in upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) chemistry. We used 6 years (2006–2012) of Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) measurements to investigate the global and seasonal distribution of stratospheric cirrus clouds and compared the MIPAS results with results derived from the latest version (V4.x) of the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) data. For the identification of stratospheric cirrus clouds, precise information on both the cloud top height (CTH) and the tropopause height is crucial. Here, we used lapse rate tropopause heights estimated from the ERA-Interim global reanalysis. Considering the uncertainties of the tropopause heights and the vertical sampling grid, we define CTHs more than 0.5 km above the tropopause as stratospheric for CALIPSO data. For MIPAS data, we took into account the coarser vertical sampling grid and the broad field of view so that we considered cirrus CTHs detected more than 0.75 km above the tropopause as stratospheric. Further sensitivity tests were conducted to rule out sampling artefacts in MIPAS data. The global distribution of stratospheric cirrus clouds was derived from night-time measurements because of the higher detection sensitivity of CALIPSO. In both data sets, MIPAS and CALIPSO, the stratospheric cirrus cloud occurrence frequencies are significantly higher in the tropics than in the extra-tropics. Tropical hotspots of stratospheric cirrus clouds associated with deep convection are located over equatorial Africa, South and Southeast Asia, the western Pacific, and South America. Stratospheric cirrus clouds were more often detected in December–February (15 %) than June–August (8 %) in the tropics (±20∘). At northern and southern middle latitudes (40–60∘), MIPAS observed about twice as many stratospheric cirrus clouds (occurrence frequencies of 4 %–5 % for MIPAS rather than about 2 % for CALIPSO). We attribute more frequent observations of stratospheric cirrus clouds with MIPAS to the higher detection sensitivity of the instrument to optically thin clouds. In contrast to the difference between daytime and night-time occurrence frequencies of stratospheric cirrus clouds by a factor of about 2 in zonal means in the tropics (4 % and 10 %, respectively) and at middle latitudes for CALIPSO data, there is little diurnal cycle in MIPAS data, in which the difference of occurrence frequencies in the tropics is about 1 percentage point in zonal mean and about 0.5 percentage point at middle latitudes. The difference between CALIPSO day and night measurements can also be attributed to their differences in detection sensitivity. Future work should focus on better understanding the origin of the stratospheric cirrus clouds and their impact on radiative forcing and climate.

Observation of Cirrus Clouds with GLORIA during the WISE Campaign: Detection Methods and Cirrus Characterization

“…The frequency of occurrence above the tropopause varied from 27 % to 16 % for the CI and from 24 % to 13 % for the extinction method, where the difference between both approaches were due to LOS scenes with heterogeneous tropopause heights. Our results support the higher occurrence frequencies reported in literature (Goldfarb et al, 2001;Spang et al, 2015;Zou et al, 2020) in contrast to lower values derived from CALIPSO (Pan and Munchak, 2011;Zou et al, 2020) at mid-latitudes. Using the same criterion as in Spang et al (2015); Zou et al (2020), i.e.…”

“…Spang et al (2015) analyzed CRISTA data (Spang et al, 2015) and concluded with a frequency of occurrence 5 of 5 % of all observations and Zou et al (2020) obtained 2 % for CALIPSO data and 4 -5 % for MIPAS data. The analyses of Spang et al (2015) and Zou et al (2020) used the criterion of the cirrus CTH being 0.5 km above the tropopause derived from ERA-Interim. Using the same criterion, the frequency of occurrence is 4 % for CTHs above the TP med for the extinction method and 7 % for the CI method.…”

Massive-Parallel Trajectory Calculations version 2.2 (MPTRAC-2.2): Lagrangian transport simulations on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs)

“…The daily mean zonal mean tropopause data from MPTRAC are in accordance with first thermal tropopause data extracted from Global Positioning System (GPS) radio occultation observations on the same day. A more detailed description of the extraction of tropopause information with MPTRAC as well as the application of the data to identify stratospheric ice clouds is provided by Zou et al (2020Zou et al ( , 2021.…”

Supplementary material to "Massive-Parallel Trajectory Calculations version 2.2 (MPTRAC-2.2): Lagrangian transport simulations on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs)"

“…The daily mean zonal mean tropopause data from MPTRAC are in accordance with first thermal tropopause data extracted from Global Positioning System (GPS) radio occultation observations on the same day. A more detailed description of the extraction of tropopause information with MPTRAC as well as the application of the data to identify stratospheric ice clouds is provided by Zou et al (2020Zou et al ( , 2021.…”