Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3174072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting “Hole in the Wall” Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inertia and selective nonuse of the Looking up Technology-in-Practice by women observed in our study expands on earlier studies that have Facilities,e.g. highlighted the privacy implications of voice user interfaces in public spaces (Robinson et al 2018;Easwara Moorthy and Vu 2015). What we find is the complex interaction between users' choices and preferences, social and cultural norms of behaviour as well as a layered understanding of space of use.…”
Section: Looking Upmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inertia and selective nonuse of the Looking up Technology-in-Practice by women observed in our study expands on earlier studies that have Facilities,e.g. highlighted the privacy implications of voice user interfaces in public spaces (Robinson et al 2018;Easwara Moorthy and Vu 2015). What we find is the complex interaction between users' choices and preferences, social and cultural norms of behaviour as well as a layered understanding of space of use.…”
Section: Looking Upmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, the potential for voice technologies to support inclusion is complicated by both digital literacy in general as well as issues of space and privacy (Easwara Moorthy and Vu 2015). Robinson et al (2018) has deployed an early-stage conversational speech probe in public space in a Mumbai slum. Their study brings out some interesting findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, advances in AI, natural language processing (NLP) and conversational agents (CA) have created new technological possibility to (dis)solve the problem of Dēvanāgarī input and search for emergent users. In previous work, we reported on design workshops and technology walks in Dharavi, where residents identified opportunities for providing smart speaker services in public areas [30]. Deploying a simple Wizard-of-Oz probe that allowed passers-by to ask and receive answers to Hindi and Marathi language questions, the research demonstrated the value of experimenting with publicly accessible smart speakers, which in turn promote awareness and community learning about speech interaction.…”
Section: Voice User Interfaces In Resource-constrained Settingsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the studies described here, as in our prior work, we chose to deploy and longitudinally evaluate prototypes in Dharavi, precisely because its residents have been engaged in envisaging how public speech-based systems could be useful in their contexts, and have already experimented with prototype devices of different capability and fidelity (e.g., [26,30]). We are of course conscious of comments that "HCI might have become too concerned with use in new places at the very time when a revolutionary technology is altering the basis of computing" [17].…”
Section: Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the other scenarios also stimulated prototypes and deployments (not reported here) with evidence of their value to users and communities. For example, the Audioliser led us to consider the use of speech systems in public settings [33,36]; and, a Google Physical Web trial emerged from the Shopping Beacon scenario [34]. Figure 8 shows the further stages in the continued development, evaluation, refinement and deployment of the Safety Pod scenario.…”
Section: Completing the Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%