2002
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-71782002030100031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting in Situ Chlorophyll-a Data Along the Coast in North-Central Chile Considering Multiscale Environmental Variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…growth in the ocean may be affected by variations in food availability, despite them being omnivores with a wide diet range, including zoo-and phytoplankton as well as small sh and invertebrates (Anderson 1994; Howard & Scott 1959; Tsikhon-Lukanina & Nikolaeva 2004). In the Humboldt Current System, increased phytoplankton concentrations induced by local upwelling events and increased radiation and temperature in austral summer (Marin et al 2003;Montecino et al 2002) may additionally contribute to enhanced growth rates of L. anatifera during the summer months. However, growth rates of L. australis in winter were only slightly lower compared to L. anatifera in summer, suggesting that food supply in winter was not a limiting factor.…”
Section: Seasonal and Regional Growth Rate Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…growth in the ocean may be affected by variations in food availability, despite them being omnivores with a wide diet range, including zoo-and phytoplankton as well as small sh and invertebrates (Anderson 1994; Howard & Scott 1959; Tsikhon-Lukanina & Nikolaeva 2004). In the Humboldt Current System, increased phytoplankton concentrations induced by local upwelling events and increased radiation and temperature in austral summer (Marin et al 2003;Montecino et al 2002) may additionally contribute to enhanced growth rates of L. anatifera during the summer months. However, growth rates of L. australis in winter were only slightly lower compared to L. anatifera in summer, suggesting that food supply in winter was not a limiting factor.…”
Section: Seasonal and Regional Growth Rate Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%