2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting intercropping indices with respect to potato-legume intercropping systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The dry mass was determined by oven-drying about 500 g samples at 65 • C to a constant mass. The yields were converted into potato equivalent (PEY) using Equation (6) (Gitari et al, 2018a(Gitari et al, , 2020a. For dolichos, the estimations considered grain and shoot biomass separately as this legume is used as both pulse and forage.…”
Section: Chlorophyll Content Light Interception Crop Yield and Radimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dry mass was determined by oven-drying about 500 g samples at 65 • C to a constant mass. The yields were converted into potato equivalent (PEY) using Equation (6) (Gitari et al, 2018a(Gitari et al, , 2020a. For dolichos, the estimations considered grain and shoot biomass separately as this legume is used as both pulse and forage.…”
Section: Chlorophyll Content Light Interception Crop Yield and Radimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The land equivalent ratios recorded under intercropping systems were greater than one, an indication that integration of legumes into potato-based cropping systems favored growth and yield of the companion crops grown in mixtures. The system productivity index of intercrops were greater than that of the sole potato, which was an indication that interspecific facilitation was greater than interspecific competition (Gitari et al, 2020a). This implies that intercropping resulted in greater land-use efficiency and resource productivity (Wahla et al, 2009;Machiani et al, 2018).…”
Section: Intercropping and Silicon Effect On Crop Yield And Resource mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arithmetic average of LER and ATER is likely to give a more precise estimation of yield advantage than LER and ATER (Mason et al, 1986): Originally put forward by Mason et al (1986), equation (7) has been wrongly cited, and also corrupted by several authors. For instance, Yaseen et al (2014) and Gitari et al (2020) cited Mead and Willey (1980) as the progenitor of the formula, and also used a spurious formula for land use efficiency (LUE), which vitiated the results and interpretations of their experiments. Clearly, these authors and their peer reviewers had ignored to check up the cited works of Mason et al (1986) and Mead and Willey (1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common bean and dragonhead intercropping were compared with their sole croppings using the land equivalent ratio (LER) based on the following formula: italicLER=Y1D1+Y2italicCB2 Where: Y 1 and Y 2 represent the D and CB yields in the intercropping and D 1 and CB 2 represent dragonhead and common bean yields in sole croppings, respectively (Gitari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where: Y 1 and Y 2 represent the D and CB yields in the intercropping and D 1 and CB 2 represent dragonhead and common bean yields in sole croppings, respectively (Gitari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Land Equivalent Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%