2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0008423909990758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Local Campaign Effects: An Experiment Involving Literature Mail Drops in the 2007 Ontario Election

Abstract: Abstract. An invariant feature of constituency election campaigns is the literature mail drop, usually a one-page leaflet or card left at the door profiling the candidate and appealing for electoral support. In this article, we report on a field experiment designed to assess the effects of such mail drops. The experiment was conducted during the 2007 Ontario provincial election campaign in the constituency of Cambridge and entailed distributing literature for the Green party candidate in that constituency. Aft… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, the ads simply increase turnout among groups that, in the elections considered here, were less likely to vote for the Conservative party (all four groups are negatively associated with a Conservative vote in both elections). We suspect that this is an effect similar to that found by Brown and colleagues (2010) in their study of literature drops; the ads simply mobilize voters who already have a particular predisposition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Rather, the ads simply increase turnout among groups that, in the elections considered here, were less likely to vote for the Conservative party (all four groups are negatively associated with a Conservative vote in both elections). We suspect that this is an effect similar to that found by Brown and colleagues (2010) in their study of literature drops; the ads simply mobilize voters who already have a particular predisposition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The most widely supported conclusions are that turnout decisions are influenced by sociodemographic characteristics (including income, education, age, gender, race/ethnicity), attitudes and beliefs (partisanship, political interest, efficacy, duty), and mobilization efforts by parties and interest groups. In relatively recent developments in this literature, experimental designs have been utilized to explore the effects of arguments and mobilization techniques (e.g., Brown, Perrella, & Kay, ; Davenport et al, ; Gerber, Green, & Larimer, ). Within this emerging segment of the literature on turnout, work on the effects of asking voters to make a plan to vote—known as implementation intention interventions—represents a recent and still largely unreplicated contribution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High numbers of volunteers were found to have strong predictive coefficients in regression models. Contrariwise, mail drops were found to have marginal effects only on higher income polls’ vote outcomes (Brown et al, 2010). The relationships between campaigning efforts and vote share are thus even more complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%