2006
DOI: 10.1080/14754830500519714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Resentments: Jean Améry and the Dark Side of Forgiveness and Reconciliation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, is reconciliation, even when it does take place in either a "thin" or a "thick" version, always a marker of progress? Is it healthy to forgive one's former enemies, or can resentment in some cases be a more morally sound reaction, as it has been suggested recently (Brudholm 2006)? Although scenes of inter-communal un-derstanding and co-operation are emotional to observe-as I myself have felt during fieldwork in the Balkans-reconciliation can never be a normative demand from above or from the outside, as this could produce a sense of re-victimization among disadvantaged groups (Ross 2001).…”
Section: Conclusion: Researching Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Likewise, is reconciliation, even when it does take place in either a "thin" or a "thick" version, always a marker of progress? Is it healthy to forgive one's former enemies, or can resentment in some cases be a more morally sound reaction, as it has been suggested recently (Brudholm 2006)? Although scenes of inter-communal un-derstanding and co-operation are emotional to observe-as I myself have felt during fieldwork in the Balkans-reconciliation can never be a normative demand from above or from the outside, as this could produce a sense of re-victimization among disadvantaged groups (Ross 2001).…”
Section: Conclusion: Researching Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We should not take the desirability of reconciliation for granted-either from the perspective of those who would be reconciled or even from that of a higher goal such as Bosnia and Herzegovina, or Euro-Atlantic Integration, or even Peace (see Brudholm 2006). However, rather than simplistically reducing differing perspectives on such issues to national sides, they must be seen in terms of possible futures too.…”
Section: The "Sides" In Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There has recently been a surge in interest in emotions within transformational moments. The affective dimensions of forgiveness, post‐atrocity trauma, shame, humiliation, and anger have been widely explored in the Transitional Justice scholarship (Govier 2002; Opotow 2002; Philpott 2006; Walker 2006a; Minkkinen 2006; Griswold 2007; Brudholm 2006, 2008). 16 Nevertheless, while this scholarship unveils some of the important emotional aspects of the transitional context, no attempt is made to rigorously show on what grounds and how these affects can be made to serve the cause of democracy.…”
Section: Democracy V Justice: Another False Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas Brudholm also looks at the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission's celebration of forgiveness through the lens of Améry's account of ressentiment , and naturally, finds it wanting. The blindness towards the moral affirmation inherent in resentment makes this institution problematic (Brudholm 2006; 2008). While acknowledging these authors' effort to draw attention to the relevance and legitimacy of resentments within democratising contexts, this paper seeks to go beyond their specific interest in the limitations of truth commissions with regard to such negative emotions.…”
Section: Recovering Negative Emotions For Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%