2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016jf003900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting salt marsh resilience to sea level rise: Are ponds responsible for permanent land loss?

Abstract: Ponds are unvegetated rounded depressions commonly present on marsh platforms. The role of ponds on the long‐term morphological evolution of tidal marshes is unclear—at times ponds expand but eventually recover the marsh platform, at other times ponds never recover and lead to permanent marsh loss. Existing field observations indicate that episodic disturbances of the marsh vegetation cause the formation of small (1–10 m) isolated ponds, even if the vegetated platform keeps pace with relative sea level rise (R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
141
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
141
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of vegetated marsh, both on the plain and fringes, reduces the long-term net trapping potential of a marsh complex by exposing the substrate and decreasing the momentum extraction and wave attenuation by stems26. In microtidal, sediment-starved settings, increased open water ultimately favours marsh erosion, which in turn increases the unvegetated area, in a positive feedback that deteriorates the entire marsh27. In certain cases, ponding on the marsh plain can result in permanent marsh loss through slumping and soil creep, with runaway erosion preventing recovery27.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loss of vegetated marsh, both on the plain and fringes, reduces the long-term net trapping potential of a marsh complex by exposing the substrate and decreasing the momentum extraction and wave attenuation by stems26. In microtidal, sediment-starved settings, increased open water ultimately favours marsh erosion, which in turn increases the unvegetated area, in a positive feedback that deteriorates the entire marsh27. In certain cases, ponding on the marsh plain can result in permanent marsh loss through slumping and soil creep, with runaway erosion preventing recovery27.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In microtidal, sediment-starved settings, increased open water ultimately favours marsh erosion, which in turn increases the unvegetated area, in a positive feedback that deteriorates the entire marsh27. In certain cases, ponding on the marsh plain can result in permanent marsh loss through slumping and soil creep, with runaway erosion preventing recovery27. Sediment deposition is mostly controlled by vegetative influence on settling and direct capture, and therefore scales with the area of the vegetated surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once elevation loss has been initiated and interior ponds form, hydrologic forces can expand the size of the pond through “bank slumping” (Stevenson et al. ) or “soil creep” (Mariotti ). These mass wasting processes begin when interior ponds reach a critical width (which varies according to the local tidal range), causing edge soils to move downslope by gravity, slowly expanding the pond (Mariotti , Mariotti et al.…”
Section: Future Research Directions and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) or “soil creep” (Mariotti ). These mass wasting processes begin when interior ponds reach a critical width (which varies according to the local tidal range), causing edge soils to move downslope by gravity, slowly expanding the pond (Mariotti , Mariotti et al. ).…”
Section: Future Research Directions and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanently inundated ponds are natural features of salt marshes and have been called pools, potholes, and rotten spots in the literature [ Harshberger , , ; Mariotti , ; Miller and Egler , ; Redfield , ]. They can occupy 1–60% of salt marsh platforms [ Adamowicz and Roman , ; Millette et al , ; Schepers et al , ; Wilson et al , ] but are rarely characterized or integrated into whole‐ecosystem assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%