The deepest parts of Earth's crust are widely inaccessible to traditional geochemical sampling and so their composition is poorly understood. Only in areas where eruptions have brought xenoliths to the surface or where tectonic activity has exhumed medium and high grade metamorphic terrains are we able to partially determine the composition of the deep (middle and lower) continental crust. Even so, these ex situ, aged, weathered, and transported rocks may not adequately represent the overall, current composition of the deep crust. Such inaccessibility has challenged geochemists for decades (Dumond et al., 2018), leading to competing models for continental crust and bulk silicate Earth (BSE) compositions, formation, and evolution (e.g., Javoy et al. (2010);McDonough et al. (2020); Turcotte and Schubert (2014)). Dissonance in the geochemical community stems from known and unknown unknowns; that is, we are mostly certain of the uncertainties in our geochemical and petrological measurements, but we are uncertain if our samples are truly representative of large swathes of the deep crust or if they are merely point samples. Xenoliths and terrains are the sum of the processes that form them, which may cause them to differ from what is presently at 15-45 km and deeper.Seismological techniques, however, provide another piece of the cipher by directly measuring the physical state of large sections of the deep crust. Physical properties (e.g., density, Poisson's ratio, Vp, and Vs) determined from these in situ geophysical experiments can be compared to laboratory experiments on rocks of known compositions, particularly medium to high grade metamorphic lithologies (amphibolite and granulite facies rocks) to