2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gc009040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Australian‐Antarctic Ocean‐Continent Transition Zone Using Petrological and Geophysical Characterization of Exhumed Subcontinental Mantle

Abstract: The final lithospheric breakup of the Australian‐Antarctic rift system remains controversial due to sparse geological constraints on the nature of the basement along the ocean‐continent transition (OCT) zones. We present new interpretations of multichannel seismic reflection transects and new petrological data of dredged mantle rocks along the East Antarctic margin (Seamount B, offshore Terre Adélie). By combining both data sets, we show that a 50–100 km wide domain of cold and fertile subcontinental mantle wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(314 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the highly localized, extremely felsic borders around Antarctica and between Japan and China likely indicate a misclassification of crust type and/or Moho depth. Oceanic‐type crust has been documented in both regions (Cho et al., 2004; Gohl, 2008; Hirata et al., 1992; McCarthy et al., 2020). Better Moho and temperature resolution of the ocean‐continent transition should increase the accuracy of compositional models in these regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the highly localized, extremely felsic borders around Antarctica and between Japan and China likely indicate a misclassification of crust type and/or Moho depth. Oceanic‐type crust has been documented in both regions (Cho et al., 2004; Gohl, 2008; Hirata et al., 1992; McCarthy et al., 2020). Better Moho and temperature resolution of the ocean‐continent transition should increase the accuracy of compositional models in these regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015), McCarthy et al. (2020), Tugend et al. (2018)), this model is not consistent across the entire transitional zone.…”
Section: Interpretation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We present seismo-stratigraphic interpretations of two multichannel seismic re ection pro les crossing (line SO36-47) and closely passing (line N417) Site 1168 (Figure 1c, d). We follow the seismic interpretation of Sauermilch et al (2019a) and Hill et al (1997) for the sedimentary units and continental crust, and the exhumed subcontinental mantle part is our own (following the characteristics of McCarthy et al, 2020). Key re ections are linked to lithological units, largely following interpretations by Sauermilch et al (2019a) and the Shipboard Scienti c Party (Exon et al, 2001b).…”
Section: Seismic Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We interpreted the exhumation of subcontinental mantle material o shore of western Tasmania, along its oceancontinent transition zone (OCT; Figure 1). e interpretation of the mantle domain followed the analytical scheme of Gillard et al (2015) and McCarthy et al (2020), who investigated exhumed mantle domains of the o shore central southern Australian and conjugate East Antarctic margins (Seamount B, east of Adélie Ri Block) respectively.…”
Section: Seismic Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation