2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.802625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Biological Behavior of Salmonella enterica in Hydric Resources: A Meta-Analysis Study Addressing the Critical Role of Environmental Water on Food Safety and Public Health

Abstract: The increasing number of studies reporting the presence of Salmonella in environmental water sources suggests that it is beyond incidental findings originated from sparse fecal contamination events. However, there is no consensus on the occurrence of Salmonella as its relative serovar representation across non-recycled water sources. We conducted a meta-analysis of proportions by fitting a random-effects model using the restricted maximum-likelihood estimator to obtain the weighted average proportion and betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, monitoring activities can target the three sampling sites (Bypass Cave well, Durbin well, and the Barren River) that contributed over half of Salmonella ‐positive samples in the month of November and summer and fall seasons. The higher prevalence of Salmonella in the mainly groundwater‐fed surface water in the Bowling Green, KY, study is consistent with previous studies reporting Salmonella from surface waters with differing land use (Cho et al., 2022; Hubbard et al., 2020; Rocha et al., 2022). Salmonella was reported from all nine surface water samples, and 77% ( n = 13) of groundwater samples collected near poultry farms (Hubbard et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, monitoring activities can target the three sampling sites (Bypass Cave well, Durbin well, and the Barren River) that contributed over half of Salmonella ‐positive samples in the month of November and summer and fall seasons. The higher prevalence of Salmonella in the mainly groundwater‐fed surface water in the Bowling Green, KY, study is consistent with previous studies reporting Salmonella from surface waters with differing land use (Cho et al., 2022; Hubbard et al., 2020; Rocha et al., 2022). Salmonella was reported from all nine surface water samples, and 77% ( n = 13) of groundwater samples collected near poultry farms (Hubbard et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consistent with findings herein, Rubislaw, Newport, and Hartford were among the top five serotypes identified from surface waters (rivers and streams) in Georgia (Cho et al., 2022). Similarly, Newport was the most common serotype across published studies focusing on ground‐ and surface waters (Rocha et al., 2022); it was also the most frequently isolated from water streams examined in the vegetable‐producing region in Virginia (Bell et al., 2015) and Maryland Eastern shore (Callahan et al., 2019) of the United States. Taken together, these three serotypes are frequently present both in the ground and surface waters and commonly associated with human infections (Cho et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additional factors such as land use, the presence of wild animals, and concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) are relevant factors for microbial contamination ( Strawn et al, 2013b ). As surface water is exposed to the environment and animals are more susceptible to microbial contamination, wild animal activity (e.g., birds, reptiles, wild hogs) was observed in all the ponds’ surrounding areas, which may have contributed to the ponds’ microflora ( Rocha et al, 2022 ). Poultry operations are often with a source of Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni ( Vereen et al, 2013 ; Bardsley et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To carry out the analysis, the variables were divided into the categories contained in Table 2. The HDI was classified in countries as low (< 0.8) and high (≥ 0.8), in accordance to what was applied by Rocha et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%