2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the chronostratigraphy of Late Pleistocene loess-paleosol sequences in southwestern Ukraine: OSL dating of Kurortne section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
3
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SiO 2 /TiO 2 ratio also shows a good agreement between BAK and SAG and the reference section of Kurortne (Black Sea Shore) in southwest Ukraine (Tecsa et al, 2020), which is visible in the K 2 O/Al 2 O 3 vs. SiO 2 /TiO 2 diagram as well (Figures 4,8). In general, two sediment pathways were reconstructed for Ukrainian loess covers.…”
Section: The Eastern Carpathian (Ec) Sedimentary Pathwaysupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The SiO 2 /TiO 2 ratio also shows a good agreement between BAK and SAG and the reference section of Kurortne (Black Sea Shore) in southwest Ukraine (Tecsa et al, 2020), which is visible in the K 2 O/Al 2 O 3 vs. SiO 2 /TiO 2 diagram as well (Figures 4,8). In general, two sediment pathways were reconstructed for Ukrainian loess covers.…”
Section: The Eastern Carpathian (Ec) Sedimentary Pathwaysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Major elements are given in oxide form (%; Na 2 O, Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , K 2 O, TiO 2 , Fe 2 O 3 ), whereas trace elements are expressed in mg/kg (V, Cr, Ni, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, Th). A similar analytical procedure was applied for all other studies used in this comparison (Obreht et al, 2015;Bösken et al, 2018Bösken et al, , 2019Marković et al, 2020;Tecsa et al, 2020).…”
Section: Geochemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the Dnipro stage, rep re sented by ex tremely well de vel oped loess units in the Roksolany and Vyazivok sec tions, is cor re lated with MIS 6. OSL dat ing re sults af ter Fedorowicz et al (2012Fedorowicz et al ( , 2013 and Constantin et al (2019) from the up per loess lay ers at Roksolany sup port our in ter pre ta tion and are con sis tent with sim i lar lu mi nes cence ages of L1 and L2 loess ob tained in the Kurortne sec tion (Tecsa et al, 2020), 25 km south of Roksolany, and the near est Ro ma nian, Bul gar ian and Ser bian se quences (see Necula et al, 2015, Constantin et al, 2019, Lomax et al, 2019. The Roksolany Tephra layer in the up per most part of R-L2 po ten tially can be cor re lated with, wide spread in the Dan ube -Black Sea loess-palaeosol se quences, the "L2 Tephra" (Fig.…”
Section: Chronostratigraphic Revisions Of the Roksolany Sectionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Our chronostratigraphic in ter pre ta tion of the up per most units of the Roksolany sec tion is in agree ment with pre vi ous and re cent stud ies of sev eral loess-palaeosol se quences in the west ern part of the Black Sea Low land. Vozgrin (2001) and Tecsa et al (2020) sug gested that the up per palaeosols by their pedomorphological char ac ter is tics should be long to the Vytachiv (MIS 3), Pryluky (MIS 5a-c) and Kaydaky (MIS 5e) units (rather than to the Dofinivka pedocomplex). In most loess sec tions in Ukraine the lat ter two are welded and not sep a rated by the Tyasmyn loess (Veklich, 1968(Veklich, , 1982Sirenko and Turlo, 1986;Bolikhovskaya and Molodkov, 2006;Gerasimenko, 2006;Matviishyna et al, 2010).…”
Section: Chronostratigraphic Revisions Of the Roksolany Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%