2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the consumer brand engagement concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
20

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
68
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Hollebeek, Srivastava, and Chen (2019) revised previous definitions referring to engagement in terms of consumers' volitional investment of cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and social resources into brand interactions. Still, a recent study testing Hollebeek, Glynn, and Brodie's (2014) widely used consumer-brand engagement scale points to discriminant and face validity issues for cognitive and affective components of the scale; their analysis, along with that of an expert panel, concluded that the measure failed to encapsulate concepts such as self-brand connection and brand attachment, leading the researchers to conclude that engagement is solely behavior based (Obilo, Chefor, and Saleh 2020).…”
Section: Consumer Engagement and Computational Advertisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Hollebeek, Srivastava, and Chen (2019) revised previous definitions referring to engagement in terms of consumers' volitional investment of cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and social resources into brand interactions. Still, a recent study testing Hollebeek, Glynn, and Brodie's (2014) widely used consumer-brand engagement scale points to discriminant and face validity issues for cognitive and affective components of the scale; their analysis, along with that of an expert panel, concluded that the measure failed to encapsulate concepts such as self-brand connection and brand attachment, leading the researchers to conclude that engagement is solely behavior based (Obilo, Chefor, and Saleh 2020).…”
Section: Consumer Engagement and Computational Advertisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different definitions and conceptualizations of consumer brand engagement have been published in the scholarly literature. While certain conceptualizations of engagement focus on its multidimensional nature (Obilo et al 2020 ), others have defined it with reference to specific customer activities or behavioral patterns (Schivinski et al 2016 ; Muntinga et al 2011 ). As such, van Doorn et al ( 2010 ) define engagement as “customers’ behavioral manifestations toward a brand or firm, beyond purchase, resulting from motivational drivers” (p. 254).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up till then, inconsistencies exist between several research when defining consumer engagement and its dimensions. However, several identifying aspects can be drawn, first, engagement reinforce the centricity of customers in relationship management (Verhoef et al, 2010), it explicitly accounts for the dynamics of interactions between customers and the focal object; the brand and its related elements including other fellow customers, its community (virtual or offline), content on social media, the firm and its products (Hollebeek et al, 2014;Obilo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Vol2 No1 Part 1 Jan 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%