2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac273f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Distance to Radio Loops I and IV Using Gaia and Radio/Optical Polarization Data

Abstract: Galactic synchrotron emission exhibits large angular scale features known as radio spurs and loops. Determining the physical size of these structures is important for understanding the local interstellar structure and for modeling the Galactic magnetic field. However, the distance to these structures is either under debate or entirely unknown. We revisit a classical method of finding the location of radio spurs by comparing optical polarization angles with those of synchrotron emission as a function of distanc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If proven, the existence of such an association would definitely close the controversy and favor a local LNPS. As a matter of fact, these high latitude dust or gas structures are all located at short distances, as demonstrated by various works on gas absorption [37], stellar polarization (e.g., [32], and 3D extinction maps ( [52], also see the b +60 • dust cloud in Figure 2 or other high latitude nearby (100-200 pc) faint structures in Figure 7 (right)). However, the association between gas and dust on one side, and X-ray, gamma-ray and synchrotron structures on the other side, has never been proven.…”
Section: On the Link Between Nps/loop I And Interstellar High-latitud...mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If proven, the existence of such an association would definitely close the controversy and favor a local LNPS. As a matter of fact, these high latitude dust or gas structures are all located at short distances, as demonstrated by various works on gas absorption [37], stellar polarization (e.g., [32], and 3D extinction maps ( [52], also see the b +60 • dust cloud in Figure 2 or other high latitude nearby (100-200 pc) faint structures in Figure 7 (right)). However, the association between gas and dust on one side, and X-ray, gamma-ray and synchrotron structures on the other side, has never been proven.…”
Section: On the Link Between Nps/loop I And Interstellar High-latitud...mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Observations directly or indirectly related to LNPS could fill long chapters, and we restrict this introduction to early multi-wavelength observations and to the main findings of the last decade. Several presentations of Loop I and discussions about its origin have been published, see the very deep analysis by [34] and references therein, and for a very recent discussion see [32]. Loop I was first detected in radio as the most prominent Galactic loop, with the NPS at its bottom ([4, 19, 26, 48]).…”
Section: First Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the top panel of tudes with increasing frequency (implying that the CREs at high latitudes are being reaccelerated) or we are measuring the spectral index from a superposition of different components along the lineof-sight at low Galactic latitudes; an argument that has been cited previously as a way of resolving discrepancies in the distance measurements to Loop I (Panopoulou et al 2021). This is especially interesting since the spectral indices we measure using the 408 MHz data around Loop I agree with those in the literature (e.g., Davies et al 2006), implying it is not simply a product of region selection.…”
Section: Synchrotron: Template Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Lastly, we block out the region associated with the North Polar Spur (NPS). Our motivation here is that there are indications that the higher latitudes of the NPS are originating locally rather than from the Galactic center, based on starlight polarisation observations (Panopoulou et al 2021). In order to remain as impartial as possible for the designation of this region, we adopt a cut for it selected in Wolleben (2007).…”
Section: Simulation Setup For the Polarised Synchrotron Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%