2011
DOI: 10.1179/009346911x13140904575585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Exploitable Threshold Model: 14th century resource procurement and landscape dynamics on Perry Mesa, Arizona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethnographic studies of traditional potters indicate that in the vast majority of cases, these craftsmen employ clay and tempering material obtained from sources located within no more than ca. 7 km of the locus of manufacture (Arnold, 2006; Kelly et al, 2011). This practice is substantially a function of the wide availability of potting clays and tempering materials in most regions, combined with the costs of time and effort involved in traveling to a raw material source and in transporting the material acquired to the workshop location.…”
Section: Raw Materials For Pottery Production At Pompeiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethnographic studies of traditional potters indicate that in the vast majority of cases, these craftsmen employ clay and tempering material obtained from sources located within no more than ca. 7 km of the locus of manufacture (Arnold, 2006; Kelly et al, 2011). This practice is substantially a function of the wide availability of potting clays and tempering materials in most regions, combined with the costs of time and effort involved in traveling to a raw material source and in transporting the material acquired to the workshop location.…”
Section: Raw Materials For Pottery Production At Pompeiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some criticisms have been levelled against the model because it does not account for the range of sociocultural mechanisms or factors that could be responsible for preferring particular clays and tempers over others, and the consequent effect this would have on the variation in pottery composition (cf. Kelly et al., 2011). Nevertheless, the model was never designed to cover all such mechanisms or account for all factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, ethnographic research indicates that resources for making pottery will be collected in tandem with other activities people undertake, such as collecting water and domestic fuel. In challenging the idea that the distance to resources and clay and temper quality are universally important considerations of potters, archaeologists have argued that the co-occurrence of resources on landscapes (e.g., water, clay, fuel, temper) tends to better explain why certain clays and temper are used for pottery manufacture (Kelly et al., 2011). This relationship was predicted for some time by ethnographic research in Africa (Gosselain, 1994, Gosselain and Livingstone Smith, 2005, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a comparative database of raw materials is essential to archaeological considerations of vessel production and provenance (Bishop and Blackman 2002). Toward this end, natural clay deposits have long been studied by archaeologists as a way to understand spatial variation in chemistry and mineralogy, which is relevant to performance characteristics of pottery fabrics as well as useful as provenance markers (e.g., Jorge et al 2013; Kelly et al 2011; Michelaki et al 2015; Neff and Bove 1999; Rice 2015; Stark et al 2000). Although most comparative clay studies in archaeology are project specific and limited in scope, there are distinct benefits to studying clays on a large scale with consistent protocols.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%