2021
DOI: 10.3390/insects12111015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Hybridization Processes in the Triatoma brasiliensis Complex (Hemiptera, Triatominae): Reproductive Isolation between Triatoma petrocchiae and T. b. brasiliensis and T. lenti

Abstract: Triatoma petrocchiae is a species morphologically similar to T. b. brasiliensis (which resulted in a synonymization event); despite this similarity, genetic, morphological, and experimental crossbreeding studies confirmed the specific status of T. petrocchiae. Considering that both species have been reported living in sympatry and that, for a long time, most species of the T. brasiliensis complex were considered only chromatic variants of T. b. brasiliensis, we carried out experimental crosses between T. b. br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generation of hybrids is relatively common between the species of this subfamily, with the main evolutionary events responsible for the decline of the hybrid lineage (postzygotic barriers) being inviability (offspring mortality before reaching adulthood) [ 8 ], sterility (partially or completely infertile offspring) [ 9 , 10 ] and the collapse of the hybrid (high offspring mortality from the second generation) [ 11 , 12 ]. Several studies involving experimental crosses have already been carried out among the triatomines, focusing mainly on taxonomic [ 8 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and epidemiological aspects [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. On the other hand, although prezygotic barriers are less frequent and, generally, are present in only one direction of the crossings, as observed between Rhodnius colombiensis Mejia, Galvão and Jurberg, 1999 and R. pallescens Barber, 1932 [ 28 ], Triatoma pseudomaculata Corrêa and Espínola, 1964 and T. infestans (Klug, 1834) [ 29 ], T. delpontei Romaña and Abalos, 1947 and T. platensis Neiva, 1913 [ 30 ] and T. longipennis Usinger, 1939 and T. mopan Dorn et al, 2018 [ 17 ], they may be present between species that are very distant from the phylogenetic point of view [ 29 , 31 ] and between species of different genera ( Triatoma Laporte, 1832 × Panstrongylus Berg, 1879, Triatoma × Rhodnius Stål, 1859 and Rhodnius × Psammolestes Bergroth, 1911 [ 18 , 23 , 31 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation of hybrids is relatively common between the species of this subfamily, with the main evolutionary events responsible for the decline of the hybrid lineage (postzygotic barriers) being inviability (offspring mortality before reaching adulthood) [ 8 ], sterility (partially or completely infertile offspring) [ 9 , 10 ] and the collapse of the hybrid (high offspring mortality from the second generation) [ 11 , 12 ]. Several studies involving experimental crosses have already been carried out among the triatomines, focusing mainly on taxonomic [ 8 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and epidemiological aspects [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. On the other hand, although prezygotic barriers are less frequent and, generally, are present in only one direction of the crossings, as observed between Rhodnius colombiensis Mejia, Galvão and Jurberg, 1999 and R. pallescens Barber, 1932 [ 28 ], Triatoma pseudomaculata Corrêa and Espínola, 1964 and T. infestans (Klug, 1834) [ 29 ], T. delpontei Romaña and Abalos, 1947 and T. platensis Neiva, 1913 [ 30 ] and T. longipennis Usinger, 1939 and T. mopan Dorn et al, 2018 [ 17 ], they may be present between species that are very distant from the phylogenetic point of view [ 29 , 31 ] and between species of different genera ( Triatoma Laporte, 1832 × Panstrongylus Berg, 1879, Triatoma × Rhodnius Stål, 1859 and Rhodnius × Psammolestes Bergroth, 1911 [ 18 , 23 , 31 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%