2019
DOI: 10.26817/16925777.452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Issue of Knowledge in English Language Teaching, a Revision of Literature

Abstract: In the following literature review, I set out to show an analysis of the main developments regarding the study of in-service English teachers’ (IELTs) knowledge. In the first part, I trace scholarly work regarding the topic at the national and international levels. I bring up both poststructuralist and decolonial perspectives to problematize the concept of teacher knowledge base (Shulman 1987, 2005). By means of research profiling and data base search, articles and trends related to the issue of teachers’ know… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, discourses about elp and eltis have maintained the colonial architecture in elt. Although these discourses construct pedagogy as a colonial political praxis (Madge et al, 2009) and identity as a monolithic disciplinary-based category, a final conclusion drawn in this study suggests that Andrey's critical stance echoes other teachers in the field (see, Castañeda-Londoño, 2019;Granados-Beltrán, 2016;Ubaque-Casallas & Castañeda-Peña, 2020). They all seem to agree on elp as a path for teachers to configure "horizons of theorizing, thinking, doing, being, feeling, looking and listening-individually and collectively-towards the decolonial" (Walsh, 2013, p. 67); a path only possible if English language teachers choose to transgress the colonial legacy.…”
Section: How I See Myself As An Efl Teachermentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, discourses about elp and eltis have maintained the colonial architecture in elt. Although these discourses construct pedagogy as a colonial political praxis (Madge et al, 2009) and identity as a monolithic disciplinary-based category, a final conclusion drawn in this study suggests that Andrey's critical stance echoes other teachers in the field (see, Castañeda-Londoño, 2019;Granados-Beltrán, 2016;Ubaque-Casallas & Castañeda-Peña, 2020). They all seem to agree on elp as a path for teachers to configure "horizons of theorizing, thinking, doing, being, feeling, looking and listening-individually and collectively-towards the decolonial" (Walsh, 2013, p. 67); a path only possible if English language teachers choose to transgress the colonial legacy.…”
Section: How I See Myself As An Efl Teachermentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In elt, much of the related literature, mostly published in English, covers the term knowledge from its singularity (Castañeda-Londoño, 2019). This corresponds to a universalized understanding of knowledge that has become not only standard but also normative and legitimate.…”
Section: English Language Teaching and Teachers' Identity(ies)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Castañeda-Londoño (2019), this episteme "stems from the European modernity, " hence "does not leave room for other forms of knowledge" (p. 226).…”
Section: Mentoring In Teaching Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This action of generating localised materials and methodologies acknowledges teachers as historical thinkers and transformers of the world (Freire, 1998), and subjects of knowledge (Foucault, 1980;Quiceno, 1988) since they possess not only 'content, pedagogical, curricular, learners, and educational purposes' knowledge (Shulman, 1987), but also "empirical, experiential, normative, critical, ontological, and reflective-synthetic domains" (Kincheloe, 2004, p. 51). In the Colombian context, Castañeda-Londoño (2018) argues both a traditional and universal as opposed to a critical and emancipatory teachers' knowledge base. Teachers are also regarded as "agents of permanent change" (Núñez & Téllez, 2009, p. 184), "subaltern intellectuals" (Kumaravadivelu, 2014, p. 76), and public and transformative intellectuals within their communities.…”
Section: Coloniality Of Beingmentioning
confidence: 99%