2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the magnetization of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Abstract: Context. The landing of the Philae probe as part of the ESA Rosetta mission made it possible to study the magnetization of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P) by combining observations from the lander and orbiter. In this work, we revisit the magnetic properties with information gained during the progression of the mission for a comprehensive understanding of the circumstances of Philae's descent and landing. Aims. The aim is to derive a limit for any possible magnetization of the cometary material on the su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic field measurements measured by the Rosetta lander Philae at the Jupiter family comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko offer a unique constraint on nebular magnetism. Other than being the only near-field measurements at a comet, the 67P measurements are also distinguished by the fact that they were taken as part of a near-surface >1-km-long transect with four separate landings during which the magnetometer sensor reached within 5 cm of the surface ( 168 ). Philae constrained the magnetization of the comet to <5 × 10 −6 emu g −1 for spatial scales of >10 cm ( 171 ).…”
Section: Paleomagnetismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnetic field measurements measured by the Rosetta lander Philae at the Jupiter family comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko offer a unique constraint on nebular magnetism. Other than being the only near-field measurements at a comet, the 67P measurements are also distinguished by the fact that they were taken as part of a near-surface >1-km-long transect with four separate landings during which the magnetometer sensor reached within 5 cm of the surface ( 168 ). Philae constrained the magnetization of the comet to <5 × 10 −6 emu g −1 for spatial scales of >10 cm ( 171 ).…”
Section: Paleomagnetismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spacecraft have measured the magnetic field at the surface of two asteroids, during flybys of five other asteroids, and at the surface of a comet (166)(167)(168). Although two of the asteroid flybys have tentatively identified remanent magnetic fields, these detections are ambiguous.…”
Section: Spacecraft Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preceding MASCOT, there was only one direct magnetic measurement from the surface of Eros (S‐type) by a magnetometer on the NEAR spacecraft during its final crash landing (Acuña et al, ). Other magnetic observations were conducted by the Philae lander on a comet 67P/Churyumov‐Gerasimenko (Heinisch et al, ). Both measurements found no detectable signal related to the surface fields and provided therefore only an upper limit on the material specific magnetic moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific magnetic moment given either directly in the relevant paper or derived from therein provided magnetic moment. The references for the respective properties are for Gaspra (Kivelson et al, ), Braille (Richter et al, ), Šteins (Auster et al, ), Lutetia (Coradini et al, ; Richter et al, ), Eros (Acuña et al, ; McCoy et al, ), and 67P (Heinisch et al, ). The magnetization values for simplicity show orders of magnitude only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Earth, other magnetised planets, and the Jovian moon Ganymede, the magnetospheric structure restricts entry of these extra-atmospheric particles into the atmosphere, confining auroras to regions with open field lines. However, comets are unmagnetised (Heinisch et al 2019), so they exhibit more similarities to regions of Mars with no crustal magnetisation, where diffuse auroras have been seen (Schneider et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%