2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.97.096002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the pseudoscalar meson and glueball mixing and key issues in the search for a pseudoscalar glueball state

Abstract: We revisit the mixing mechanism for pseudoscalar mesons and glueball which is introduced by the axial vector anomaly. We demonstrate that the physical mass of the pseudoscalar glueball does not favor to be lower than 1.8 GeV if all the parameters are reasonably constrained. This conclusion, on the one hand, can accommodate the pseudoscalar glueball mass calculated by lattice QCD, and on the other hand, is consistent with the high-statistics analyses at BESIII that all the available measurements do not support … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We list our results at various scales in table 19 and compare to literature values in table 20, where the scale is not specified. These analyses are based on, e.g., QCD sum rule calculations [116,117], large-N c ChPT [9,97] and related state mixing models that include a pseudoscalar glueball [118,119]. We find agreement with the references that give error estimates, with the exception of [9].…”
Section: Pseudoscalar Gluonic and Fermionic Matrix Elementssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We list our results at various scales in table 19 and compare to literature values in table 20, where the scale is not specified. These analyses are based on, e.g., QCD sum rule calculations [116,117], large-N c ChPT [9,97] and related state mixing models that include a pseudoscalar glueball [118,119]. We find agreement with the references that give error estimates, with the exception of [9].…”
Section: Pseudoscalar Gluonic and Fermionic Matrix Elementssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…While there is some tension for the combination m s H s η , most of our results agree with the estimate in the FKS approximation, where the pseudoscalar matrix element is taken in the SU(2) isospin limit, Feldmann [96] We again emphasize that the above combinations are renormalization group invariants. It is particularly interesting to inspect the ratio of the gluonic matrix elements that can be used to define a mixing angle in the gluonic sector [97], 0.023 0.058 Beneke and Neubert [9] 0.022(2) 0.057(2) Cheng et al [118] 0.026(28) 0.054(57) Singh [117] 0.0220(50) 0.037(10) Qin et al [119] 0.016 0.051 Ding et al [106] 0.024 0.051 this work at µ = 1GeV 0.0172( 10 Table 20. Literature values for the anomaly matrix elements in comparison with our results at various scales.…”
Section: Pseudoscalar Gluonic and Fermionic Matrix Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy cannot be easily mediated by considering the glueballmeson mixing in the presence of dynamical quarks. It is interesting to notice that some phenomenological studies advocate η(1405) and η(1495) be the same state which appears differently in different final states due to some dynamical mechanism [12]. If this is the case, then there is no redundant pseudoscalar meson mass region and subsequently no need for an additional degree of freedom such as a glueball in 1.5 GeV mass region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Ref. [40] a revisit of the mixing scheme of Refs. [28,38] was carried out, and the numerical results of Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%