2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-020-09974-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Relationships Between Genomic G + C Content, RNA Secondary Structures, and Optimal Growth Temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This genomic trait has been widely studied, and its evolution has been proposed to be associated with numerous mutational and selective forces driven by genetic, metabolic, and ecological factors [ 4 19 ]. The high temperature might be the most long-debating [ 20 22 ]. Because G:C pairs have an additional hydrogen bond than A:T pairs, the GC-rich genomes are expected to be thermally more stable in high-temperature environments [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This genomic trait has been widely studied, and its evolution has been proposed to be associated with numerous mutational and selective forces driven by genetic, metabolic, and ecological factors [ 4 19 ]. The high temperature might be the most long-debating [ 20 22 ]. Because G:C pairs have an additional hydrogen bond than A:T pairs, the GC-rich genomes are expected to be thermally more stable in high-temperature environments [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, this study did not shake the confidence of Musto et al [ 35 ] on the correlation between Topt and genomic GC content in prokaryotes. Although Musto and coauthors have rebutted all the criticisms, their studies have not convinced later authors of review articles [ 4 , 20 , 36 ]. For example, Agashe and Shankar [ 4 ] claimed that “ it seems unlikely that genomic GC content is driven by thermal adaptation ” after reviewing the results of Hurst and Merchant [ 27 ] and Xia et al [ 28 ], but without mentioning the debate on Musto et al [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This genomic trait has been widely studied, and its evolution has been proposed to be associated with numerous mutational and selective forces driven by genetic, metabolic, and ecological factors (Foerstner et al 2005; Hildebrand et al 2010; Mann and Chen 2010; Raghavan et al 2012; Wu et al 2012; Agashe and Shankar 2014; Glemin et al 2014; Šmarda et al 2014; Reichenberger et al 2015; Aslam et al 2019; Dietel et al 2019; Weissman et al 2019; Kogay et al 2020). Among them, the high temperature might be the most long-debating one (Galtier and Lobry 1997; Forsdyke 2021; Meyer 2021). Because G:C pairs have an additional hydrogen bond than A:T pairs, the GC-rich genomes are thermally more stable in high-temperature environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, this study did not shake the confidence of Musto et al (35) on the correlation between Topt and genomic GC content in prokaryotes. Although Musto and coauthors have rebutted all the criticisms, their studies have not convinced later authors of review articles (4, 20, 36). For example, Agashe and Shankar (4) claimed that “ it seems unlikely that genomic GC content is driven by thermal adaptation ” after reviewing the results of Hurst and Merchant (27) and Xia et al (28), but without mentioning the debates on Musto et al (30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation